Doctor who allegedly gave fake Covid-19 jabs asks for restrictions instead of suspension

Jipson Quah was previously suspended in March 2022 for 18 months, the maximum period allowed under the law. ST PHOTO: KELVIN CHNG

SINGAPORE – A doctor accused of injecting patients with saline solution in place of Covid-19 vaccines has asked to be subjected to specific restrictions instead of being suspended.

Jipson Quah, 35, who is currently on an interim suspension, proposed to not treat Covid-19 patients, administer Covid-19 vaccines, update the national registry about Covid-19 matters, or conduct any form of Covid-19 tests.

The general practitioner also proposed to practise under supervision and report to a supervisor to review his work at the end of each week.

But the Singapore Medical Council’s (SMC) Interim Orders Committee (IOC) rejected the proposal and ordered his interim suspension to continue on its current terms in the latest review on Nov 21.

Quah was previously suspended by the IOC in March 2022 for 18 months, the maximum period allowed under the law.

SMC subsequently received approval from the High Court to extend the suspension by 12 months, bringing the suspension period to a total of 30 months.

His current interim suspension order is effective until Sept 22, 2024, or until the conclusion of the disciplinary proceedings, whichever ends earlier.

Interim orders are not a punishment but are conditions imposed to safeguard the public against potential harm until the case against the doctor is resolved.

Quah has been accused of falsely reporting to the Ministry of Health (MOH) that he had vaccinated certain patients against Covid-19, when in fact he had injected the 15 patients with saline solution.

He is also alleged to have uploaded the results of no fewer than 430 remote pre-event Covid-19 tests in the last two weeks of December 2021 that were not compliant with the rules at the time. This allowed the people who took the tests to attend events with invalid results.

Quah faces 17 charges of fraud by false representation and is out on $30,000 bail. If found guilty, he could be jailed for a maximum of 20 years and fined.

Arguing for a restricted and conditional registration instead of suspension, Quah said both the Attorney-General’s Chambers and MOH are unable to provide clear timelines for investigations and proceedings.

Quah said that as he is not the cause of the delays, it would be unfair to penalise him with an extended suspension.

He also said his alleged offences are in relation to Covid-19 measures, and since Covid-19 has been declassified as a pandemic, there is now no threat from him to members of the public.

He has shut down all his clinics and ceased practice for 22 months, and has “lost substantial income since the beginning of the investigations”, he said in his submissions.

SMC said the interim suspension order is still necessary for the protection of the public.

While the allegations took place within the specific context of the pandemic, the issues raise concern about Quah’s integrity and honesty as a medical professional and relate directly to the clinical setting, the medical professional watchdog added.

Quah’s alleged actions demonstrate “dishonesty and a cavalier attitude” towards healthcare-related regulations intended to protect the public and public health, SMC said.

In making its decision, the IOC said the allegations against Quah are very serious and grave.

The IOC added: “The reputation of the profession could be adversely affected... if a medical practitioner who is facing serious allegations and numerous criminal charges was allowed to continue to practise while criminal proceedings were ongoing.”

Merely imposing conditions or restrictions would not sufficiently protect the public or satisfy the wider public interest, noted the IOC.

The IOC also said that any potential financial loss to Quah would not outweigh the public interest in maintaining the interim suspension order against him.

Quah’s criminal case is scheduled for a pre-trial conference on Dec 29.

He is represented by lawyer James Gomez of Edmond Pereira Law Corporation, while Ms I-Lin Lee and Ms Grace Lim of Drew & Napier acted for the SMC in this review.

The IOC consisted of Dr Subramaniam Suraj Kumar, who was the chairman, Associate Professor Agnes Ng Suah Bwee and Adjunct Associate Professor Lee Cheng. Mr Kenny Chooi of Adsan Law acted as legal assessor.

Join ST's WhatsApp Channel and get the latest news and must-reads.