Unauthorised AI-generated music sparks copyright debates in South Korea

AI-generated music has gained immense popularity in South Korea, but this trend often involves the unauthorised use of artistes' voices and music. PHOTO: REUTERS

SEOUL – First released in August 2022, K-pop girl group NewJeans’ Hype Boy is gaining popularity once again – thanks to a rendition “sung” by well-known 61-year-old South Korean rock singer Yim Jae-beom.

But Yim did not actually record the cover. It was an artificial intelligence (AI) program that generated the song to sound like Yim was singing it.

Some of his fans were surprised by how accurate the AI was able to mimic the singer’s voice, down to the exact way he breathes, pauses and sighs.

“It was something that I hadn’t expected before. I very much enjoyed it,” said 29-year-old user Hwang Chan-hui, speaking of Yim’s AI version of Hype Boy on YouTube.

“Of course, I know NewJeans is amazing, but my favourite (singer) is Yim Jae-beom. His husky voice drives me crazy. I’ve wished that Yim would release more diverse albums, but he didn’t, which makes me a little sad.”

AI-generated music has gained immense popularity in South Korea on platforms like YouTube and Instagram, where hundreds of creators are using the technology to recreate existing tracks with other artistes’ voices.

The more unexpected the combination, the more interest it garners.

However, this trend often involves the unauthorised use of an artiste’s voice and music.

While AI-generated music creators argue that their work should be viewed as a form of artistic expression apart from business considerations, some creators are reaping benefits – albeit not directly from their AI works.

Spot-AI-fy, a YouTube channel that specialises in AI-generated music, carries a total of 235 video clips on the platform.

Launched on May 13, the videos have recorded over 17.3 million views as of Sunday.

The videos on the channel are AI songs created by Sorisori, an AI-based music generation service, featuring the likes of what sounds like American pop star Ariana Grande singing a Korean song to an AI cover of South Korean singer IU singing Cupid by K-pop girl group Fifty Fifty.

For the monthly subscription fee of 14,800 won (S$15.40) on the English website, subscribers can generate up to 200 tracks of music using AI.

Remote video URL

However, some say that AI music creators should not be eligible to claim credit or copyright to their work because they do not hold rights to the original voices or tracks.

The copyright laws in Korea do not specifically cover AI music, although there are protections for the rights and freedom of the original artiste.

The Korea Music Copyright Association (KMCA), a non-profit organisation administering public performance, broadcasting and reproduction rights on behalf of copyright holders, expressed concern over AI-generated music, arguing that the phenomenon poses challenges to the existing copyright norms.

In an e-mail to The Korea Herald, a KMCA official said: “Currently, it’s difficult to respond to the copyright infringement of generative AI because it’s hard to distinguish the original sources used by the generative AI from the final product.

“Also, there is no legal requirement to declare whether generative AI was used.”

The e-mail added that there is a need to safeguard the interests of artistes and the music industry.

Legal experts also warned of possible copyright violations by AI-generated music.

A lawyer at Duksu Law Offices, Mr Beom Yu-kyung, said that it is necessary to establish a system that makes clear the copyright of the original data used for AI training.

He said: “When it comes to the original reference of the background data, AI-generated music creators cannot avoid criticism.

“The current AI technologies aren’t yet able to generate authentic products on their own. They still require external data, which is the point where a copyright infringement occurs.”

He added: “In this regard, a system to certify the original source and to mandate obtaining consent from the copyright holder for the use of their properties is necessary to prevent potential copyright violations.”

In May, Democratic Party of Korea lawmaker Lee Sang-heon, who chairs the parliamentary committee on culture, sports and tourism, submitted a proposal to amend the Contents Industry Promotion Act.

The proposed amendment, by Mr Lee and nine other lawmakers, calls for a new provision to mandate specifying whether generative AI was used while making content.

The proposal is awaiting review by the National Assembly.

Mr Lee also brought up concerns over AI-generated music during the National Assembly audit of the Culture Ministry on Oct 10.

Mr Lee asked Culture Minister Yoo In-chon to support the proposed amendment if it passes the Assembly, playing an AI-generated rendition of South Korean singer Kim Kwang-seok’s Around Thirty, featuring Minister Yoo’s voice.

Minister Yoo agreed on the urgency of the matter.

The Culture Ministry has introduced a draft proposal of regulations and guidelines for AI utilisation in creative works.

While the guidelines are not legally binding, the Culture Ministry is working to release the final draft of the guidelines before the year-end. THE KOREA HERALD/ASIA NEWS NETWORK

Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.