Government subsidies: What makes them so controversial

They are a major bone of contention in current Sino-US tensions but predate US President Trump's trade wars, and are unlikely to go away, and not just in China

New: Gift this subscriber-only story to your friends and family

A year ago, I argued in these pages that the US-China trade war is about technology rather than trade, and about contrasting models of economic governance and technological innovation - China's of state-driven industrial policy versus the US' of market-led private entrepreneurship. Sure enough, bilateral trade negotiations have now stalled precisely over this divide. A major point of contention is China's subsidies for state-owned enterprises (SOE) in targeted high-tech sectors. This strategy has also been followed by European countries with decidedly unimpressive results, particularly in France.

The most notable (and rare) success story, the European multi-country consortium Airbus, has been embroiled in decades-long World Trade Organisation (WTO) disputes with the US-owned Boeing over "illegal state subsidies".

Already a subscriber? 

Read the full story and more at $9.90/month

Get exclusive reports and insights with more than 500 subscriber-only articles every month

Unlock these benefits

  • All subscriber-only content on ST app and straitstimes.com

  • Easy access any time via ST app on 1 mobile device

  • E-paper with 2-week archive so you won't miss out on content that matters to you

Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

A version of this article appeared in the print edition of The Straits Times on June 13, 2019, with the headline Government subsidies: What makes them so controversial. Subscribe