Grab, Uber fined $13m for violating competition laws

Watchdog also spells out series of measures to lessen impact of ride-hailing firms' merger

A ComfortDelgro taxi passes Uber and Grab offices in Singapore on March 26, 2018. PHOTO: REUTERS

The merger between ride-hailing firms Grab and Uber will not be unwound but they were fined a combined $13 million yesterday by Singapore's competition watchdog, which said their union earlier this year had violated competition laws.

Grab was fined about $6.4 million while Uber was fined about $6.58 million by the Competition and Consumer Commission of Singapore (CCCS), which also spelt out a series of measures to cushion the impact of the merger on commuters, drivers and potential competitors.

The CCCS ruled that the Grab-Uber deal had reduced market competition and resulted in Grab getting an 80 per cent share of the Republic's ride-hailing market, up from 50 per cent previously.

"Mergers that substantially lessen competition are prohibited and CCCS has taken action against the Grab-Uber merger because it removed Grab's closest rival, to the detriment of Singapore drivers and riders," said CCCS chief executive Toh Han Li.

Uber announced in March that it was exiting South-east Asia - including Singapore - and that its business in the region would be acquired by its rival Grab. This was in exchange for the American firm getting a 27.5 per cent stake in Grab, as well as a seat on the Singapore-based firm's board.

The CCCS noted that since the merger, effective fares had risen by about 10 to 15 per cent while drivers' commissions had shrunk.

While it was too late to unwind the deal, the commission set out directions aimed at easing the impact on both riders and drivers and levelling the playing field for other competitors. Under these measures, Grab will have to remove its existing exclusivity arrangements with taxi fleets and drivers, as well as maintain pre-merger pricing algorithm and driver commission rates.

Uber will also be required to sell vehicles from its car rental arm Lion City Rentals - which was not included in the deal with Grab - to any potential competitor with a "reasonable offer", and will need the approval of CCCS to sell them to Grab.

These measures could be suspended if a competitor attains a 30 per cent share of the market for one month. Both Uber and Grab would have their penalties lifted if this competitor maintains a 30 per cent share for six consecutive months, the CCCS said.

Noting the existing players each held less than 5 per cent of the market, Mr Toh said: "We don't rule out joint ventures between the parties so that they can operate more like a single entity."

Uber and Grab will be given up to a month to appeal against the decision, said Mr Toh.

Responding to the CCCS decision, Grab Singapore head Lim Kell Jay said the firm was glad the deal with Uber was not unwound, but insisted it was legal and that Grab did not "intentionally or negligently" breach competition laws.

Uber's chief international business officer Brooks Entwistle said the American firm was "disappointed" with the decision.

Both firms said they will review the CCCS ruling before deciding whether to appeal.

The Land Transport Authority said it supports the CCCS decision, adding it was in line with its own ongoing review of the sector.


Join ST's WhatsApp Channel and get the latest news and must-reads.

A version of this article appeared in the print edition of The Straits Times on September 25, 2018, with the headline Grab, Uber fined $13m for violating competition laws. Subscribe