LONDON (REUTERS) - Lawmakers rejected Prime Minister Theresa May’s Brexit deal for a third time on Friday (March 29), sounding its probable death knell and leaving Britain’s withdrawal from the European Union in turmoil on the very day it was supposed to quit the bloc.
The decision to reject a stripped-down version of Mrs May’s divorce deal has left it totally unclear how, when or even whether Britain will leave the EU, and plunges the three-year Brexit crisis to a deeper level of uncertainty.
“I fear we are reaching the limits of this process in this House,” Mrs May told Parliament after the defeat.
“The implications of the House’s decision are grave.”
Within minutes of the vote, European Council president and summit chair Donald Tusk said EU leaders would meet on April 10 to discuss Britain’s departure from the bloc.
A succession of European leaders said there was a very real chance Britain would now leave without a deal, a scenario that businesses fear would cause chaos for the world’s fifth-biggest economy.
Mrs May had framed the vote as the last opportunity to ensure Britain actually left the EU, making a passionate plea to lawmakers to put aside party differences and strongly held beliefs.
But in a special sitting of Parliament, they voted 344-286 against the EU Withdrawal Agreement, agreed after two years of tortuous negotiations with the bloc.
“The legal default now is that the United Kingdom is due to leave the European Union on April 12,” Mrs May said.
She cautioned that any further delay to Brexit would probably be a long one beyond the current deadline, and would mean Britain holding elections to the European Parliament.
The British pound, which has been buoyed in recent weeks by hopes that the likelihood of an abrupt "no-deal" Brexit is receding, fell half a per cent after Mrs May lost, to as low as US$1.2977, but then recovered some of its losses.
“If the deadline is extended longer, we will re-engage with sterling because that will be the start of the slow death of Brexit,” said Mr Salman Ahmed, global investment strategist at Lombard Odier Investment Managers.
TALKS TO CONTINUE
Mrs May had offered on Wednesday to resign if the deal passed, in a bid to win over eurosceptic rebels in her Conservative Party who support a more decisive break with the EU than the divorce her deal offers.
The vote leaves her Brexit strategy in tatters. With no majority in Parliament for any Brexit option so far, it is unclear what Mrs May will now do. Options include asking the EU for a long delay, Parliament forcing an election, or a “no-deal” exit.
However, Mrs May’s spokesman said the Prime Minister would continue talks with opponents of the deal and some political correspondents said she could bring it back a fourth time, perhaps in a “run-off” against any alternative that Parliament itself came up with.
Britain now has under two weeks to convince the 27 capitals of the EU that it has an alternative path out of the impasse, or see itself cast out of the bloc on April 12 with no deal on post-Brexit ties with its largest trading ally.
French President Emmanuel Macron, speaking as Parliament voted, said the EU needed to accelerate no-deal planning and Austrian Chancellor Sebastian Kurz said that unless Britain came up with a plan, there would be a “hard” Brexit.
“The risk of a no-deal Brexit is very real,” Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte told reporters.
Mrs May’s deal had twice been rejected by huge margins this year and, although she was able to win over many Conservative rebels, a hard core of eurosceptics, who see “no-deal” as the best option, and the Northern Irish Democratic Unionist Party, which props up her minority government, refused to back it.
On Monday, lawmakers who have tried to grab control of the process will attempt to agree on an alternative Brexit plan that could command majority cross-party support in Parliament. The options that have so far gathered most support involve closer ties to the EU, and a second referendum.
A first attempt at non-binding “indicative votes” on Wednesday failed to produce a majority for any of the eight options on offer.
Many lawmakers believe the only way to solve the crisis will be a snap election – even though it would throw up a host of unknowns for the major parties.
“The last thing this country needs right now is a general election,” transport minister Chris Grayling told Sky News. “We’ve actually got to sort out the Brexit process, we can’t throw everything up in the air.”
The 2016 referendum vote to leave the EU revealed a Britain divided over many more issues, and has provoked impassioned debate about everything from secession and immigration to capitalism, empire and what it means to be British.
Hundreds of thousands of Britons marched through London last Saturday demanding a second referendum, while on Friday thousands of angry Brexit supporters protested in the capital.
“What should have been a celebration is in fact a day of betrayal,” Mr Nigel Farage, a leading Brexit campaigner, told Reuters.
The uncertainty around Brexit, Britain's most significant political and economic move since World War II, has left allies and investors aghast.
Opponents fear Brexit will make Britain poorer and divide the West as it grapples with both the unconventional United States presidency of Donald Trump and growing assertiveness from Russia and China.
Supporters say that while the divorce might bring some short-term instability, in the longer term it will allow Britain to thrive if cut free from what they cast as a doomed project to forge European unity.