BEIJING (BLOOMBERG) - China shrugged off United States President Donald Trump's latest escalation of the tariff war, with state media signalling the government is ready to weather the economic turbulence as no progress to resolve the stand-off is in sight.

Editorials and commentaries since the Trump administration slapped tariffs on roughly US$110 billion (S$153 billion) in Chinese imports on Sunday (Sept 1) have focused on the impact that the latest hikes on goods produced in China will have on US consumers.

Late on Sunday, the State Council, or Cabinet, released a statement pledging to increase economic support if needed.

Chinese officials have yet to give a clear sign that they intend to carry through a plan for in-person negotiations in Washington this month, a meeting that was planned before the latest round of tit-for-tat measures.

Few column inches were dedicated to the trade war on Monday, and there was little evidence of a change in stance.

"It is time the US administration reconsidered its poorly thought out China-bashing moves," an editorial in the China Daily argued.

"Working to secure a trade deal would be a more fruitful approach."

The 15 per cent US duty hit consumer goods ranging from footwear and apparel to home textiles and certain technology products like the Apple Watch.

A separate batch of about US$160 billion in Chinese goods - including laptops and mobile phones - will be hit with 15 per cent tariffs on Dec 15.

Mr Trump delayed part of the levies to blunt the impact on holiday shopping.

Investors sought the safety of the yen, which edged higher against the dollar as currency markets opened for trading. The offshore yuan pared some losses to trade at 7.1682 per dollar on Monday at 10.38am in Beijing after the People's Bank of China (PBOC) set the fixing rate stronger than all estimates.

Asian stocks fell with US equity futures after the tariffs kicked in, even though the measures had been widely anticipated. S&P 500 futures opened 1 per cent lower before paring losses, and Treasury contracts advanced.

The new tariffs imposed over the weekend are "a turning point in the trade war" with the US, an editorial in the Communist Party's tabloid Global Times wrote on Sunday evening.

The report said the tariffs on daily goods are to hit US consumers directly, and it also showed Washington is almost at the end of its wits.

"The US economy cannot sustain its superficial prosperity and is facing a bigger risk of decline," the editorial said. "The Trump administration has shot Americans in the foot. When more and more Americans feel the pain, maybe it will be time for Washington to recover rationality."

While the Trump administration has dismissed concern about a protracted trade war, business groups are calling for a tariff truce and the resumption of negotiations between the world's two-largest economies.

The talks between Chinese and American trade negotiators scheduled for Washington in September are still on, Mr Trump told reporters on Sunday after returning from Camp David.

"We are talking to China, the meeting is still on," he said. The President repeated the assertion that China, not the US, is "paying" for the tariffs, and said that farmers hurt by Beijing's retaliation on US agricultural goods are being made "more than whole" by federal payments.

"We can't allow China to rip us off anymore," Mr Trump added.

China has repeatedly decried US pressure tactics, with signs that its officials are girding for a prolonged confrontation.

"China's determination to fight against the US economic warmongering has only grown stronger, and its countermeasures more resolute, measured and targeted," according to a commentary by the official Xinhua News Agency after the tariffs kicked in.

COLLATERAL DAMAGE

While Mr Trump has repeatedly said China is paying for his tariffs, many companies and economists say that US importers bear the cost - and some of it is passed on to consumers.

The non-partisan Congressional Budget Office in August projected that by 2020, Mr Trump's tariffs and trade war will reduce the level of real US gross domestic product by about 0.3 per cent and reduce average real household income by US$580.

That followed a JPMorgan Chase & Co note to clients estimating that the latest round of tariffs will increase the average cost per US household to US$1,000 a year - up from US$600 for duties enacted last year. That estimate is in the low range because it was based on a duty rate of 10 per cent, before Mr Trump increased it to 15 per cent.

GLOBAL IMPACT

The tariffs are also harming the global economy. The International Monetary Fund in July further reduced its world growth outlook, already the lowest since the financial crisis, amid the uncertainty from the trade conflict.

China's retaliation took effect as of 12.01pm on Sunday in Beijing, with higher tariffs being rolled out in stages on a total of about US$75 billion of US goods. Its target list strikes at the heart of Mr Trump's political support - factories and farms across the Midwest and South at a time when the US economy is showing signs of slowing down.

Higher Chinese duties that took effect Sept 1 include an extra 10 per cent on American pork, beef, and chicken, and various other agricultural goods, while soybeans will get hit with an extra 5 per cent tariff on top of the existing 25 per cent. Starting in mid-December, American wheat, sorghum, and cotton will also get a further 10 per cent tariff. While China imposed a new 5 per cent levy on US crude oil starting from September, there was no new tariff on liquefied natural gas.

The resumption of a suspended extra 25 per cent duty on US cars will resume Dec 15, with another 10 per cent on top for some vehicles. With existing general duties on autos taken into account, the total tariff charged on US-made cars would be as high as 50 per cent.

Mr Gary Shapiro, president of the Consumer Technology Association, said the Trump administration's approach of using tariffs to pressure China into a deal has backfired.

"US companies have to spend more resources on constantly changing trade rules and less on innovation, new products and our economic health," Mr Shapiro said. "This is not how you reach a meaningful trade agreement."