Washington Post announces it will not endorse Harris or Trump in US election
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox
The New York Times endorsed Vice-President Kamala Harris in September, while the Rupert Murdoch-owned New York Post endorsed former US president Donald Trump on Oct 25.
PHOTO: REUTERS
Follow topic:
WASHINGTON - The influential Washington Post newspaper, owned by Amazon billionaire Jeff Bezos, announced on Oct 25 it will endorse neither Democrat Kamala Harris nor Republican Donald Trump in the US presidential election.
Chief executive officer William Lewis said this was a return “to our roots of not endorsing presidential candidates”.
However, the Post editorial board has endorsed candidates for much of the last four decades – all of them Democrats – before deciding to stay on the sidelines in one of the most polarising elections in US history.
Newspaper editorials have little of their once-powerful political heft. But the Post – whose slogan is “Democracy dies in darkness” – is one of a small number of traditional media outlets that still retains considerable influence among Washington’s elite.
The decision to sidestep controversy comes days after one of Trump’s most senior aides during his presidency said the Republican had praised Adolf Hitler and was himself “fascist”
Trump, meanwhile, says he represents the last chance to prevent what he describes as the collapse of the US, claiming that the country is inundated with violent migrants and has become a “garbage dump”.
The Post’s decision follows a similar move by another of the big remaining US newspapers, the Los Angeles Times.
The owner of the Times blocked the editorial board from issuing an endorsement for Ms Harris, according to editorial editor Mariel Garza, who resigned in protest on Oct 23.
By contrast, T he New York Times endorsed Ms Harris in September,
The Republican got his own boost on Oct 25 from the New York Post, the Rupert Murdoch-owned tabloid, which declared that “America is ready for today’s heroic Donald Trump to reclaim the presidency”.
‘Cowardice’?
In a statement, Mr Lewis wrote that the paper would not ever make presidential endorsements again, as had been the tradition in its earlier years. “Our job at The Washington Post is to provide through the newsroom non-partisan news for all Americans, and thought-provoking, reported views from our opinion team to help our readers make up their own minds.”
The Post has been endorsing Democratic candidates consistently as far back as the 1980s, always making clear that the editorial board works separately to the newsgathering operation – as is typical in US news organisations.
The Washington Post’s former executive editor, Mr Marty Baron, lashed out at the daily’s “cowardice, with democracy as its casualty”.
Mr Baron said Trump would see the decision “as an invitation to further intimidate” Mr Bezos.
“Disturbing spinelessness at an institution famed for courage,” Mr Baron wrote on X.
Mr Lewis said he recognised that the decision “will be read in a range of ways, including as a tacit endorsement of one candidate, or as a condemnation of another, or as an abdication of responsibility”.
“That is inevitable,” he said. “We don’t see it that way.” AFP

