US officials review intelligence sharing after damaging leak

WASHINGTON – American national security agencies are reviewing how they share their most sensitive secrets inside the United States government, and dealing with the diplomatic fallout from

the release of dozens of confidential documents,

three US officials said.

Investigators are also working to determine what person or group might have had the ability and motivation to release the intelligence reports, said one of the officials. The leaks could be the most damaging release of US government information since the 2013 publication of thousands of documents on WikiLeaks.

The US Department of Justice has opened a criminal investigation into the matter.

One US official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said the Pentagon is looking at how widely some intelligence is shared internally and making sure people who do not need it no longer have access to it.

The official said this was occasionally done within the Pentagon and intelligence community, but the leaks had prompted another look at some distribution lists.

The Pentagon continues to examine procedures governing how widely some of the most sensitive US secrets are shared, the official added.

“There have been steps to take a closer look at how this type of information is distributed and to whom,” Pentagon spokesman Chris Meagher told reporters on Monday.

He said Defence Secretary Lloyd Austin was first briefed on the leaks last Thursday. A day later, he started convening senior leaders on a daily basis to discuss the issue.

Mr Meagher said the documents appeared to be similar in format to those used to provide updates to senior leaders, but some of the images appear to have been altered.

Some of the documents, another official said, would most likely have been available to thousands of people with US and allied government security clearances despite being highly sensitive, as the information directly affected those countries.

The first official said the number of people with access to the documents underscores that sensitive information was perhaps being shared too widely with those who might not require the level of detail some of the documents contained.

“The Pentagon has needed to curtail the unbridled access to some of the most sensitive intel when they’ve (got) no justifiable reason to have it,” the first official said.

The two officials said further that although the leaks were highly concerning, many provided only snapshots of time in February and March – when they were dated – but did not appear to disclose anything about future operations.

Some of the most sensitive information is purportedly related to Ukraine’s military capabilities and shortcomings.

Although the release appears to be the most serious public leak of classified information in years, officials say it so far does not reach the scale and scope of the 700,000 documents, videos and diplomatic cables that appeared on the WikiLeaks website in 2013.

US President Joe Biden was briefed on the issue last week, White House spokesman John Kirby said on Monday.

“We don’t know who’s responsible for this. And we don’t know if they have more (that) they intend to post... is that a matter of concern to us? You’re darn right it is,” Mr Kirby told reporters.

Searching for a motive

Since the current leak came to light in March, investigators have been pursuing theories ranging from someone simply showing off the work they were doing, to a mole inside the US intelligence community or military, the first official said.

Mr Daniel Hoffman, a former senior Central Intelligence Agency undercover officer, said that given past activities of Moscow’s intelligence agencies, it was “highly likely” that Russian operatives posted documents related to Ukraine as part of a disinformation operation.

He said such operations were a “classic” practice of Russian spy services to leak authentic documents in which they have inserted false information.

The aim, he said, appeared to be to drive a wedge between Ukraine and the US, Kyiv’s largest provider of military support.

Some national security experts and US officials say they suspect the source could be American, given the breadth of topics covered by the documents, but they do not rule out pro-Russian actors. More theories could develop as the investigation progresses, they said.

The Kremlin and the Russian Embassy did not respond to a request for comment about whether Russia was involved in the leak.

Ukraine said its President and top security officials met on Friday to discuss ways to prevent leaks.

Impact on allies

The leaks have already drawn responses from some foreign governments.

On Sunday, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s office labelled as “mendacious and without any foundation whatsoever” a document asserting that the Mossad intelligence agency encouraged recent protests against Mr Netanyahu.

A South Korean presidential official said the country was aware of reports about the leaked documents and planned to discuss “issues raised” with Washington.

One of the documents gave details of internal discussions among senior South Korean officials about US pressure on Seoul to supply weapons to Ukraine, and its policy of not doing so.

It is not uncommon for the US and other countries to spy on their allies. But public disclosures of such spying are uncomfortable.

“It is going to take some time to rebuild trust with our allies,” the second US defence official interviewed by Reuters said.

Mr Michael Mulroy, a former senior Pentagon official, played down the notion that the incident could have a lasting impact on the US’ foreign relations.

“It may cause short-term problems for the relationships but I believe long term, the shared interests between the countries will still be strong.” REUTERS