US judge who criticised Trump attacks on judiciary cleared of ethics complaints

Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox

FILE PHOTO: U.S. District Judge Reggie Walton poses for a photo at the E. Barrett Prettyman Federal Courthouse in Washington, U.S., February 21, 2024. REUTERS/Elizabeth Frantz/File Photo

The Philadelphia-based 3rd Circuit Judicial Council threw out two ethics complaints against Senior US District Judge Reggie Walton in Washington.

PHOTO: REUTERS

Follow topic:

WASHINGTON - A US judge has been cleared of alleged wrongdoing for going on CNN to speak out against threats made against members of the judiciary and respond to Mr Donald Trump’s comments about the daughter of the judge who presided over the New York case in which the now-president was convicted in 2024.

The Philadelphia-based 3rd Circuit Judicial Council threw out two ethics complaints against Senior US District Judge Reggie Walton in Washington.

It found that Mr Walton did not talk about the merits of any legal case, but commented only on Mr Trump’s statements made on social media about Justice Juan Merchan, who presided over the New York criminal case, and his family.

Chief US Circuit Judge Michael Chagares said Mr Walton warned about the “unintended consequences” of public remarks like those made by Mr Trump and “also emphasised the importance of the independence of judicial officers in maintaining the rule of law and ensuring that laws are applied equally to all who appear before a judge.”

“These comments do not amount to judicial misconduct,” Mr Chagares wrote.

The ruling followed two judicial ethics complaints that were filed against Mr Walton after the judge gave a rare televised interview to CNN in March 2024.

One of the complaints was brought by a Mr Trump ally, Article III Project founder Mike Davis. The other complainant has not been identified.

The complaints accused Mr Walton of violating judicial ethics rules by commenting on the merits of a pending case, potentially tainting the jury pools in the four criminal cases then pending against Mr Trump by accusing him of making violent threats against Mr Merchan.

Mr Trump was not president at the time.

The complaints about Mr Walton’s interview were consolidated before the 3rd Circuit Judicial Council, resulting in a Jan 31 decision that was released publicly this week, finding that Mr Walton did not violate the judicial code of conduct.

The decision did not identify Mr Walton by name.

But Mr Walton, an appointee of Republican former President George W. Bush, on March 20 confirmed to Reuters he was the judge at issue. Mr Walton had no further comment.

The decision also included quotes matching a complaint filed by Mr Davis, who in an interview said it was clear Mr Walton violated judicial ethics rules.

“Naturally the judiciary protects its own, and this is why Congress must step forward with legislation imposing independent ethics body for the federal judiciary,” Mr Davis said.

The decision comes amid new concerns about judicial security prompted by vocal attacks by Mr Trump, his billionaire adviser Elon Musk and other administration officials against judges who block the president’s agenda in court.

For instance, Mr Trump has called for the impeachment of a judge who has ruled in a case concerning the administration’s deportation flights and called the jurist a “Radical Left Lunatic.”

Mr Walton appeared on CNN after Mr Trump began publicly assailing Mr Merchan and his daughter ahead of his criminal trial on charges related to

hush money paid to porn star Stormy Daniels

before the 2016 presidential election.

Mr Trump called Mr Merchan’s daughter a “Rabid Trump Hater” in a post on his social media platform.

Mr Walton told CNN it was “very disconcerting to have someone making comments about a judge,” and expressed concern that such remarks by people in authority could “resonate with others” and cause them to “maybe cause injury or death to someone.”

Mr Merchan in January sentenced Mr Trump ahead of his inauguration for a second term in office to an unconditional discharge with no prison term after a jury in 2024 found him

guilty of falsifying documents

to cover up the hush money payment. REUTERS

See more on