US judge rules Trump illegally ordered National Guard to Portland, Oregon

Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox

A Federal Protective Service police officer guards the gate of a ICE facility in Portland, Oregon, on Oct 26.

A Federal Protective Service police officer guarding the gate of an ICE facility in Portland, Oregon, on Oct 26.

PHOTO: REUTERS

Follow topic:

- US President Donald Trump unlawfully ordered National Guard troops to Portland, Oregon, a federal judge ruled on Nov 7 in a legal setback to the administration’s use of the military in American cities. 

The ruling by US District Judge Karin Immergut is the first to permanently block 

Mr Trump’s use of military force to quell protests

against the immigration authorities.

Mr Trump is also attempting to do that in Democratic-led Los Angeles, Chicago and Washington. It replaces her interim order that had prevented the Portland deployment.

White House spokeswoman Abigail Jackson said in a statement on Nov 7 that Mr Trump had exercised his lawful authority to protect federal officers.

“President Trump will not turn a blind eye to the lawlessness plaguing American cities and we expect to be vindicated by a higher court,” Ms Jackson said.

The Oregon Attorney-General’s Office did not immediately respond to an e-mail seeking comment.

Trump breaks with norms on using military

Judge Immergut, an appointee of Mr Trump, said the administration had no lawful basis to claim that there was a rebellion in Portland or that the government was unable to enforce federal law due to the protests.

“The occasional interference to federal officers has been minimal, and there is no evidence that these small-scale protests have significantly impeded the execution of any immigration laws,” she said in her 106-page opinion and order.

Mr Trump’s attempts to use military force to tamp down unrest are a sharp break with longstanding but rarely tested norms against deploying troops on US soil.

The Trump administration is likely to appeal against Nov 7’s ruling, and the case could ultimately reach the Supreme Court. 

The City of Portland and Oregon Attorney-General’s Office sued in September, alleging that the Trump administration was exaggerating occasional violence to justify sending in troops under a law permitting presidents to do so in cases of rebellion.

Judge rules Trump exceeded legal authority

Duelling narratives emerged during a three-day bench trial.

Justice Department lawyers described a violent siege overwhelming federal agents, echoing Mr Trump’s description of the city as “war-ravaged”. Lawyers for Oregon and Portland said violence has been rare, isolated and contained by local police.

Judge Immergut concluded in her order that the violence was small-scale, isolated, disorganised and had largely subsided by the time Mr Trump ordered in the National Guard in late September.

Democrats have said Mr Trump is abusing military powers meant for genuine emergencies such as an invasion or an armed rebellion.

Judge Immergut blocked Mr Trump from deploying troops to Portland with an interim order on Oct 5. 

The Ninth US Circuit Court of Appeals is considering the Trump administration’s appeal of that decision. 

Three judges, including Judge Immergut, have issued preliminary rulings that Mr Trump’s National Guard deployments are not allowed under the emergency legal authority cited by his administration. REUTERS

See more on