US judge blocks Trump plan to tie states’ transportation funds to immigration enforcement
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox
US President Donald Trump has signed executive orders calling for cutting off federal funding to so-called sanctuary jurisdictions that do not cooperate with US Immigration and Customs Enforcement.
PHOTO: REUTERS
Follow topic:
PROVIDENCE, Rhode Island - A federal judge on June 19 blocked US President Donald Trump’s administration from forcing 20 Democratic-led states to cooperate with immigration enforcement in order to receive billions of dollars in transportation grant funding.
Chief US District Judge John McConnell in Providence, Rhode Island granted the states’ request for an injunction barring the Department of Transportation’s policy, saying the states were likely to succeed on the merits of some or all of their claims.
The Trump administration did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
The ruling came in a lawsuit filed by a group of Democratic state attorneys general who argued the administration was seeking to unlawfully hold federal funds hostage to coerce them into adhering to Mr Trump’s hardline immigration agenda.
The states argued that US Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy lacked the authority to impose immigration-enforcement conditions on funding that Congress appropriated to help states sustain roads, highways, bridges and other transportation projects.
Since returning to office on Jan 20, Mr Trump has signed several executive orders that have called for cutting off federal funding
Sanctuary jurisdictions generally have laws and policies that limit or prevent local law enforcement from assisting federal officers with civil immigration arrests.
The Justice Department has filed a series of lawsuits against such jurisdictions, including Illinois, New York and Colorado, challenging laws in those Democratic-led states that it says hinder federal immigration enforcement.
The lawsuit before Judge McConnell, who was appointed by then Democratic president Barack Obama, was filed after Mr Duffy on April 24 notified states they could lose transportation funding if they do not cooperate with the enforcement of federal law, including with Immigration and Customs Enforcement in its efforts to enforce immigration law.
The states argue that policy is improper and amounts to an unconstitutionally ambiguous condition on the states’ ability to receive funding authorised by Congress as it leaves unclear what exactly would constitute adequate cooperation.
The administration has argued the policy was within Mr Duffy’s discretion and that conditions should be upheld as there is nothing improper about requiring states to comply with federal law.
The 20 states are separately pursuing a similar case also in Rhode Island challenging new immigration enforcement conditions that the Homeland Security Department imposed on grant programmes. REUTERS
