WASHINGTON (BLOOMBERG) - The US Justice Department urged a federal appeals court to reverse a decision that forced President Donald Trump to face a defamation lawsuit by a New York advice columnist who accused him of raping her.
A lower court erred by denying the department's request to substitute the United States government for Mr Trump in the suit by Ms E. Jean Carroll, which would have effectively ended the case, Acting Assistant Attorney General Jennifer Dickey said in a filing on Friday (Jan 15) in the US Court of Appeals in Manhattan.
Ms Carroll, who went public in 2019 with the alleged attack in a department store dressing room two decades ago, claims Mr Trump defamed her by calling her a politically motivated liar. She has been trying to push ahead with the exchange of evidence between the two sides, including deposing the President under oath and securing a DNA sample from him.
The US Justice Department argued that Mr Trump, who leaves office next week, is protected from Ms Carroll's suit by a law that prevents employees of the federal government from being sued for actions related to their work. US District Judge Lewis Kaplan in Manhattan rejected that argument in October, finding that Mr Trump's comments about Ms Carroll related to an allegation about conduct from before he was elected.
Ms Dickey argued in Friday's filing that Judge Kaplan's finding was wrong because Mr Trump's remarks about Ms Carroll, in which he denied attacking her or ever meeting her, were just part of his job.
Scope of his office
Mr Trump's disputed comments about Ms Carroll were an "outgrowth of the President's public response to allegations challenging his fitness for office", the government said in the filing.
"He thus acts within the scope of his office when, in this context, he seeks to defuse personal issues that threaten to impair his ability to achieve his agenda."
The appeals court will determine whether the President is an "employee of the government" for purposes of the federal law protecting such workers from litigation. It will also decide whether Mr Trump was acting within the scope of his office when he made allegedly defamatory statements.
If the court allows the US to be substituted for Mr Trump as defendant in the suit, the case would be dismissed because the government can't be sued for defamation.
Ms Carroll's lawyer Roberta Kaplan didn't immediately respond to a message seeking comment on the filing.
The case is Carroll v Trump, 20-cv-07311, US District Court, Southern District of New York (Manhattan).