Trump says he has legal right to intervene in criminal cases

WASHINGTON • US President Donald Trump has asserted that he had the legal right to intervene in federal criminal cases, a day after Attorney-General William Barr publicly rebuked him for attacks on Justice Department prosecutors and others involved in the case of Roger Stone, the President's long-time friend.

In a Friday morning tweet, Mr Trump quoted Mr Barr as saying that the President "has never asked me to do anything in a criminal case".

The President said he had "so far chosen" not to interfere in a criminal case even though he insisted that he was not legally bound to do so. "This doesn't mean that I do not have, as President, the legal right to do so, I do, but I have so far chosen not to!" he said.

Though he and Mr Barr both said the President has not directly asked for any specific inquiries, Mr Trump has long pressured law enforcement officials both publicly and privately to open investigations into political rivals and to drop inquiries. Mr Trump also pressed former attorney-general Jeff Sessions to retake control of the Russia investigation after he recused himself.

The assertion by the President, which implicitly rejected a request by Mr Barr to stop tweeting about the department's cases, adds to the mounting controversy over the decision by senior Justice Department officials to overrule prosecutors who had recommended a seven-to nine-year sentence for Roger Stone, Mr Trump's long-time friend who was convicted of seven felonies in a bid to obstruct a congressional investigation that threatened the President.

That recommendation infuriated Mr Trump, who called the department's handling of the case "a disgrace" and later praised Mr Barr after his top officials intervened to recommend a lighter sentence for Stone.

The four prosecutors who were overruled resigned from the case in protest; one quit the department entirely.

Seeking to calm the upheaval in his department, Mr Barr on Thursday issued a pointed denunciation of Mr Trump's tweets, which included criticism of the federal judge overseeing the Stone case and even the jury forewoman.

Mr Barr said the commentary from the President made it "impossible for me to do my job" and insisted that "I'm not going to be bullied or influenced by anybody".

"I cannot do my job here at the department with a constant background commentary that undercuts me," said Mr Barr, who has been one of Mr Trump's closest and most reliable allies since taking over at the Justice Department.

Past presidents in both parties have respected longstanding traditions that are aimed at preventing political influence from the White House on Justice Department investigations, especially criminal inquiries that involved administration officials or friends of the president.

The rules have been in place since the Watergate investigation, in which then President Richard Nixon sought to pressure the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI).

Mr Trump has repeatedly ignored those traditions, making contact with FBI officials and communicating with top Justice Department officials through Twitter and in person.

Meanwhile, Stone on Friday requested a new trial, just six days before he was to be sentenced.

Stone filed a motion to the federal district court in Washington for a new trial on charges of lying to Congress and witness intimidation.

The motion was sealed so his arguments for a new trial were not clear.

NYTIMES, AGENCE FRANCE-PRESSE