Trump rewarding loyalists with pardon spree

Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox

Mr Trump himself has made extensive use of executive clemency.

US President Donald Trump is doling out pardons “that look like they’re almost quid pro quo for financial donations”, said a law professor.

PHOTO: REUTERS

Follow topic:

Reality TV stars. Former lawmakers. A sheriff. A nursing home executive. A drug kingpin. What do they have in common?

They are among the Americans convicted of crimes who have received pardons from President Donald Trump since he took office in January.

And while US presidents have doled out questionable pardons in the past, Mr Trump is doing so “in a bigger, more aggressive way with sort of no sense of shame,” said Professor Kermit Roosevelt, a law professor at the University of Pennsylvania.

“The pardon power has always been a little bit problematic because it’s this completely unconstrained power that the president has,” Prof Roosevelt told AFP.

“Most presidents have issued at least some pardons where people look at them and they say: ‘This seems to be self-serving’ or ‘This seems to be corrupt in some way’.”

But Mr Trump is doling out pardons “that look like they’re almost quid pro quo for financial donations”, Prof Roosevelt said.

Among those receiving a pardon was Mr Paul Walczak, a nursing home executive convicted of tax crimes and whose mother attended a US$1 million-per-plate (S$1.28 million) fund-raising dinner at Mr Trump’s Mar-a-Lago home in April.

Other beneficiaries of Trump pardons include reality TV stars Todd and Julie Chrisley, who were serving lengthy prison sentences for bank fraud and tax evasion.

Their daughter, Ms Savannah, is a prominent Trump supporter and gave a speech at 2024’s Republican National Convention.

More than half a dozen former Republican lawmakers convicted of various crimes have also received pardons, along with a Virginia sheriff sentenced to 10 years in prison for taking US$75,000 in bribes.

On his first day in office, Mr Trump pardoned more than 1,500 supporters

who stormed the US Capitol on Jan 6, 2021,

as they sought to prevent congressional certification of Democrat Joe Biden’s 2020 election victory.

The next day,

Mr Trump pardoned Mr Ross Ulbricht

, who had been serving a life sentence for running the “Silk Road” online marketplace that facilitated millions of dollars of drug sales.

‘Just another deal’

Ms Barbara McQuade, a former prosecutor who now teaches law at the University of Michigan, said Mr Trump is not the first president to be accused of “allowing improper factors to influence their pardon decisions”.

Former US president Gerald Ford’s pardon of Richard Nixon, Mr Bill Clinton’s pardon of a commodities trader whose wife was a major Democratic donor and Biden’s

pardon of his son Hunter

, and other family members all drew some criticism.

“(But) Trump is in a class by himself in both scope and shamelessness,” Ms McQuade said in a Bloomberg opinion column.

“To him, pardons are just another deal.

“As long as a defendant can provide something of value in return, no crime seems too serious,” she said.

Democratic lawmaker Jamie Raskin, in a letter to Mr Ed Martin, Mr Trump’s pardon attorney at the Justice Department, asked what criteria are being used to recommend pardons.

“It at least appears that you are using the Office of the Pardon Attorney to dole out pardons as favours to the President’s loyal political followers and most generous donors,” Mr Raskin wrote.

Mr Martin, for his part, has made no secret of the partisan nature of the pardons recommended by his office.

“No Maga left behind,” Mr Martin said on X after the

pardon of the bribe-taking Virginia sheriff

, a reference to Mr Trump’s “Make America Great Again” slogan.

Professor Lee Kovarsky, a University of Texas law professor, said Mr Trump’s “pardon spree” opens up a “menacing new frontier of presidential power” that he calls “patronage pardoning”.

By reducing the penalty for misconduct, Mr Trump is making a “public commitment to protect and reward loyalism, however criminal,” Professor Kovarsky said in a New York Times opinion piece. AFP

See more on