WASHINGTON (NYTIMES, REUTERS) - United States President Donald Trump slapped steep tariffs on imports of washing machines and solar energy cells and panels on Monday (Jan 22).
This is the first major step by the administration to erect the kind of trade barriers Trump has frequently said are necessary to protect manufacturers in the United States.
The twin announcements came after a year of tough rhetoric – but little action – on curbing imports of cheap products from countries such as China and South Korea.
The US said it will impose a 20 per cent tariff on the first 1.2 million imported large residential washers in the first year, and a 50 per cent tariff on machines above that number. The tariffs decline to 16 per cent and 40 per cent respectively in the third year.
A 30 per cent tariff will be imposed on imported solar cells and modules in the first year, with the tariffs declining to 15 per cent by the fourth year. The tariff allows 2.5 gigawatts of unassembled solar cells to be imported tariff-free in each year.
White House advisers warned that additional trade measures related to steel, aluminium and other products from China could be coming, a signal that Trump is ratcheting up the protectionist policies he has long espoused as part of his “America First” approach.
The imposition of tariffs will most likely exacerbate trade tensions with other nations, including China, and could result in an escalation of retaliatory trade measures against imports from the United States.
Both China and South Korea harshly criticised the move, with both suggesting they could take their complaints to the World Trade Organisation, which settles trade disputes. The decisions also seemed poised to ignite a wave of similar trade cases from other US companies, which might be encouraged by Trump’s action.
Protectionism was a defining theme of the populist presidential campaign in which Trump rebuffed the longstanding Republican embrace of free and open markets.
Upon taking office, Trump pulled out of the Trans-Pacific Partnership, a 12-country trade deal, and threatened other actions, including a withdrawal from the North American Free Trade Agreement and the imposition of tariffs on foreign steel and aluminium. He has yet to make good on any of those threats.
Instead, the White House took action on imports of washing machines and solar products based on requests by companies who said their operations in the United States were being harmed by imports.
Whirlpool appealed to the White House for help in curbing washing machine imports from its Korean competitors, while two solar companies, Suniva and SolarWorld Americas, said imports of cheap solar cells and modules were similarly putting their companies at risk.
While the tariffs were welcomed by the companies that sought them, economists warned that the levies could drive up prices for consumers and hurt some US businesses.
The solar industry has been split over the tariffs. Companies that develop large-scale solar farms, as well as purchasers of solar power such as retailers and tech companies, opposed the tariffs over concerns that they would cost them more money and make solar power less competitive with other energy sources, at least in the short term.
Abigail Ross Hopper, president of the Solar Energy Industries Association, which opposed the measures, said: "(The decision) will create a crisis in a part of our economy that has been thriving, which will ultimately cost tens of thousands of hardworking, blue-collar Americans their jobs.”
Other trade sceptics were more sanguine about the President’s decision, including Democrat Senator Sherrod Brown of Ohio, where Whirlpool makes its washers. Brown, who described himself as an ally of the administration on trade, called the decision “welcome news”. He said the tariffs “will help level the playing field, and show anyone who tries to cheat our trade laws that they won’t get away with it".
The trade cases rely on a little-used section of trade law that provides a “safeguard” for industries beset by imports – and that casts a wide net on products from around the world. The law has not been used to impose tariffs since 2002, when President George W. Bush clamped down on imports of steel.
Still, that approach has shown mixed results. The World Trade Organisation (WTO) ruled against the US in 2003, and the Bush administration ultimately withdrew the measure under threat of retaliation.
China on Tuesday hinted it could take a similar approach. “With regard to the wrong measures taken by the United States, China will work with other WTO members to resolutely defend our legitimate interests,” its Ministry of Commerce said in a statement.
In both of Monday’s cases, trade officials said the safeguard measure was necessary because foreign producers were evading US restrictions on imports from specific countries by hopscotching their factories around the globe.
Robert Lighthizer, the US trade representative, said the President had decided to accept the recommendations of his trade advisers in imposing tariffs ranging from 15 per cent to 50 per cent on various imports.
“The President’s action makes clear again that the Trump administration will always defend American workers, farmers, ranchers and businesses,” Lighthizer said.
The administration was not alone in finding the imports harmful.
The US International Trade Commission, an independent body of trade officials, also examined the cases and found that imports were hurting domestic manufacturers. They also made several recommendations that ranged in severity; Trump ultimately opted for relatively stringent measures after consulting with his own advisers.
The president approved solar tariffs for the next four years, starting with levies of 30 per cent that will ultimately fall to 15 per cent.
In each of the four years, the first 2.5 gigawatts of imported solar cells will be exempted from the tariff, an exception designed to ensure that existing solar module manufacturers in the United States can still access cheap supplies of cells.
The administration said that the tariffs are largely directed at China, which over the past decade has built itself into the world’s largest manufacturer of solar products, flooding global markets with low-cost crystalline silicon panels. While the United States has previously imposed restrictions on Chinese solar products, Chinese firms simply moved production to other countries, the US trade representative said in its announcement.
But since the United States already levies many trade restrictions on Chinese products, neither measure appeared likely to put a significant dent in China’s exports.
Other countries may be hit harder. Currently, more than 95 per cent of US solar panels are imported, with half of those imports coming from Malaysia and South Korea.
While that global production frenzy has hurt US solar manufacturers, it has been a boon to those who want to buy solar power. The average cost of solar installations in the United States has fallen more than 70 per cent since 2009, from US$7.50 per watt down to around US$1.50 per watt.
But major solar companies that operate global supply chains worry that their products will be caught in the snare.
Suvi Sharma, chief executive of Solaria, a solar panel maker headquartered in California that makes products in both the United States and South Korea, said the trade action would be an incentive to shift more of its operations into the United States. But he also worried that it could damage the industry’s prospects by making solar energy more expensive in a highly competitive utility market.
“With a high tariff, there is going to be more manufacturing of solar in the United States, but the question is, at what cost?” Sharma asked.
For imported washing machines, the president approved a combined tariff and quota for the next three years. In the first year, the first 1.2 million washing machines that are imported will face a tariff of 20 per cent, while all subsequent imports will have a tariff of 50 per cent. Those tariffs are then gradually phased down in the second and third years.
In the washing machine case, Whirlpool argued that its South Korean competitors, Samsung Electronic Co. and LG Electronics, moved their production facilities around the world to avoid tariffs.
Samsung and LG described Whirlpool’s case as a protectionist grab designed to shut out products that US consumers find more attractive, and argued that such restrictions on their products would hurt consumers by raising prices. They also fought against restrictions on imported parts, saying those could slow operations at facilities they had opened in the United States, including Samsung’s new appliance factory in South Carolina.
Whirlpool’s chairman, Jeff M. Fettig, called the decision “a victory for American workers and consumers alike.” “This announcement caps nearly a decade of litigation and will result in new manufacturing jobs in Ohio, Kentucky, South Carolina and Tennessee,” he said.