Trump loses lawsuit challenging subpoena for financial records

A US judge on Monday ruled in favor of a House of Representatives committee seeking President Donald Trump's financial records from his accounting firm.
US President Donald Trump's lawyers filed a lawsuit in April to block the subpoena, saying it exceeded Congress' constitutional limits.
US President Donald Trump's lawyers filed a lawsuit in April to block the subpoena, saying it exceeded Congress' constitutional limits.PHOTO: AFP

WASHINGTON (REUTERS) - A United States judge on Monday (May 20) ruled in favour of a US House of Representatives committee seeking President Donald Trump's financial records from his accounting firm, dealing an early setback to the Trump administration in its legal battle with Congress.

US District Judge Amit Mehta in Washington also denied a request by Mr Trump to stay his decision pending an appeal.

Last Tuesday, Judge Mehta heard oral arguments on whether Mazars LLP must comply with a House of Representatives Oversight Committee subpoena.

Judge Mehta said in Monday's ruling that the committee "has shown that it is not engaged in a pure fishing expedition for the President's financial records" and that the Mazars documents might assist Congress in passing laws and performing other core functions.

It was the first time a federal court waded into the tussle about how far Congress can go in probing Mr Trump and his business affairs.

Mr Trump is refusing to cooperate with a series of investigations on issues ranging from his tax returns and policy decisions to his Washington hotel and his children's security clearances.

His lawyers argued that Congress is on a quest to "turn up something that Democrats can use as a political tool against the president now and in the 2020 election". Judge Mehta's ruling will almost certainly be appealed to a higher court.

 
 

The House Oversight Committee claims sweeping investigative power and says it needs Mr Trump's financial records to examine whether he has conflicts of interest or broke the law by not disentangling himself from his business holdings, as previous presidents did.

Lawyers for Mr Trump and the Trump Organisation, his company, last month filed a lawsuit to block the committee's subpoena, saying it exceeded Congress' constitutional limits.

Judge Mehta was appointed in 2014 by Democratic former president Barack Obama, who was often investigated by Republicans in Congress during his two terms in office.

Mazars has avoided taking sides in the dispute and said it will "comply with all legal obligations".