Trump attack on Intel CEO Tan Lip-Bu could compound factory struggles
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox
Mr Tan Lip-Bu, who took over Intel in March, has been hailed as a saviour of the struggling American chipmaker.
PHOTO: REUTERS
Farah Stockman
Follow topic:
At the end of July, Governor Mike DeWine of Ohio said Intel’s chief executive was “very, very optimistic” about the company’s plans to build multibillion-dollar semiconductor factories in his state.
Over the past week, US President Donald Trump attacked the tech executive,
Mr Trump demanded on Aug 7 that Mr Tan Lip-Bu, Intel’s new CEO,
To help build its Ohio factories, Intel received commitments worth roughly US$1.5 billion (S$1.9 billion) in federal funding in recent years, as well as a US$2 billion incentive package from the state.
The project has been badly delayed, and the chipmaker said in 2025 that the factories would not be operational until at least 2030.
The company’s challenges in Ohio highlight the risks that federal and state officials took when they financially backed Intel, a once-powerful force in chip manufacturing, an industry now dominated by the Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC).
Intel’s situation is also indicative of the struggles the Trump administration will face as it tries – through the pressure of tariffs and threats from the White House – to shift the bulk of semiconductor production to the US from Asia. When the Biden administration offered financial incentives through the Chips Act, Intel was one of the few American companies that it made sense to back.
But whether by stick or carrot, forcing this transition could prove extraordinarily difficult, as the delays around the Ohio project demonstrate.
“It’s pretty obvious that Intel has failed to meet the commitments it made to the people of Ohio,” Republican Senator Bernie Moreno of Ohio wrote on social media on Aug 7. “Now we find out its new CEO is deeply conflicted with ties to the (CPC),” he said, referring to the Communist Party of China.
“The CEO must immediately resign, the project completed, and a fraud investigation should be initiated by Ohio,” Mr Moreno added.
Semiconductor factories are extremely expensive and complicated to build. Intel has struggled to find enough customers to stay afloat as it poured money into construction. After posting an US$18.8 billion loss in 2024 in its foundry division, the company ousted its CEO in December 2024, cut 15,000 jobs and appeared to be exploring other strategies, including the possible sale of its manufacturing business to TSMC.
Asked for comment, a spokesperson for Intel referred to its most recent earnings report from July, in which the company said it was committed to completing the project in Ohio but had slowed construction to match customer demand.
Mr Dan Tierney, press secretary to Mr DeWine, said on Aug 8 that the governor remained optimistic about the project.
“We expect chips to be made in that facility,” Mr Tierney said. He added that the company had already invested US$7 billion in the construction project in Ohio, more than three times the amount of the state’s incentive package, which involves some tax credits that have yet to be paid out.
The incentive package is tied to job creation by the end of 2028, so the earliest that the state would attempt to claw back any money is 2029, Mr Tierney said.
The stakes are high for Intel and Ohio. Semiconductor chips, which are used in everything from cellphones to fighter jets, have recently become a particular focus for Mr Trump, as they were for former president Joe Biden.
Both presidents viewed domestic production as critical to national security, especially as more than 90 per cent of the world’s most advanced chips were produced in Taiwan, an island claimed by China.
In 2022, under Mr Biden, Congress passed a Bill with bipartisan support that aimed to remedy that vulnerability by pouring billions of dollars into subsidies for semiconductor companies to build facilities in the US.
Intel, the only American-owned maker of advanced logic chips, was awarded up to US$7.9 billion to build factories in the US. Only about US$2 billion of that has been disbursed.
Mr Trump has criticised the subsidy approach, arguing that tariffs are a more effective tool to bring manufacturing back to the US. He threatened last week to impose a 100 per cent duty on many imported chips.
Mr Tan, who took over Intel in March, has been hailed as a saviour of the struggling American chipmaker. He is a long-time Silicon Valley investor who focused on semiconductor start-ups, even during eras when venture capital money seemed to be pouring into software and apps.
On July 28, a company that Mr Tan once ran pleaded guilty to transferring technology that was under US export controls to Chinese entities. Though the plea agreement with the Justice Department did not name Mr Tan, Republican Senator Tom Cotton wrote to the chair of Intel’s board of directors on Aug 5, raising questions about what Mr Tan may have known about the illicit activity.
In a statement on Aug 7, Mr Tan, an American citizen who was born in Malaysia, said that “misinformation” was circulating about his past roles and that he fully shared “the President’s commitment to advancing US national and economic security”.
“I have always operated within the highest legal and ethical standards,” he said. He added that he was engaging with the administration “to address the matters that have been raised and ensure they have the facts”.
The questions surrounding Mr Tan could create yet another hurdle in the attempt to bring the manufacturing of advanced semiconductors to Ohio.
State Senator Bill DeMora, a Democrat representing Columbus, said Ohio Republicans were using Mr Trump’s attack on Mr Tan to distract from the fact that they sank public money into a project that has stalled.
Mr DeMora, who has long called the project a boondoggle, said in an interview on Aug 8 that Ohio Republicans “did all this hoopla and pageantry” to hype the Intel project. “Now they want the Intel president to step down because he has ties to China,” he said. “That’s their excuse.”
He said construction had continued with a fraction of the workers the company had promised to hire. He predicted that the site would never become a semiconductor factory.
“Intel is never going to make a chip there,” he said. NYTIMES
