US judge says Trump administration violated order lifting spending freeze

Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox

US President Donald Trump speaks to the press before signing a proclamation renaming the Gulf of Mexico as the Gulf of America aboard Air Force One, as it flies over the Gulf enroute to New Orleans, Louisiana on Febrary 09, 2025. For years, as disputes over names on the map riled up nationalist passions in several parts of the world, US policymakers have watched warily, trying to stay out or to quietly encourage peace. Suddenly, the United States has gone from a reluctant arbiter to a nomenclature belligerent, as President Donald Trump declared that the Gulf of Mexico will henceforth be called the "Gulf of America." In an executive order signed hours after he returned to the White House, Trump called the water body an "indelible part of America" critical to US oil production and fishing and "a favorite destination for American tourism and recreation activities." (Photo by ROBERTO SCHMIDT / AFP)

US President Donald Trump’s administration had told states some payments were delayed for “operational and administrative reasons”.

PHOTO: AFP

Follow topic:

WASHINGTON – A US judge on Feb 10 said US President Donald Trump’s administration violated a

court order lifting a broad freeze on federal spending

and directed the government to immediately release any withheld funds.

US District Judge John McConnell in Providence, Rhode Island, had already blocked the funding freeze with a temporary restraining order (TRO) on Jan 31, but a group of Democratic state attorneys-general who sued to block the move said last week that the government was still withholding funds.

The ruling appeared to be the first instance of a judge finding the Trump administration had violated a court order pausing a new policy roll-out. The Trump administration on Feb 10 said it is appealing.

“The broad categorical and sweeping freeze of federal funds is, as the court found, likely unconstitutional and has caused and continues to cause irreparable harm to a vast portion of this country,” Judge McConnell said on Feb 10. “These pauses in funding violate the plain text of the TRO.”

Judge McConnell said all funding must be restored at least until he can hold a hearing on the states’ motion for a longer-term order.

On Feb 6, a lawyer with the office of Democratic New York Attorney-General Letitia James told Judge McConnell that state agencies were still having difficulty accessing federal funds, including billions of dollars for infrastructure projects under the Inflation Reduction Act.

The Trump administration had told states that it believed the order did not apply to certain environmental and infrastructure spending, and that some payments were delayed for “operational and administrative reasons”.

However, Judge McConnell said that his order had been “clear and unambiguous” in applying to all funding frozen in response to sweeping executive orders by Mr Trump.

The states originally sued the administration over a memorandum from the White House’s Office of Management and Budget (OMB) announcing a wide-ranging freeze of federal spending. Soon after the lawsuit was filed, OMB rescinded that memo.

The memo was part of a larger Trump administration push to tighten federal spending and reshape the federal bureaucracy, which has sparked a flurry of lawsuits.

In a separate case over Mr Trump’s push to dismantle the US Agency for International Development (USAid), federal employee unions have accused the administration of violating a court order reinstating USAid workers who were placed on administrative leave. REUTERS

See more on