‘Mockery of science’: US experts blast Trump climate report
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox
A woman shielding herself from the hot sun with an umbrella in Alhambra, California, on Aug 20.
PHOTO: AFP
Follow topic:
- A report commissioned by the Trump administration disputes the scientific consensus on human-caused climate change.
- 85 scientists rebutted the report, accusing the government of using tactics similar to the tobacco industry.
- The DOE report claimed extreme weather events weren't increasing, US temperatures weren't rising which has been rejected by scientists.
AI generated
WASHINGTON - A report commissioned by the Trump administration that disputes the scientific consensus on human-caused climate change mimics tactics once used by the tobacco industry to manufacture doubt, leading US experts said on Sept 2.
In a sweeping 440-page rebuttal, 85 scientists accused the government of relying on a small group of handpicked contrarians
The Trump administration’s 150-page report was published on the Department of Energy’s (DOE) website in late July to support the administration’s proposal to overturn the 2009 Endangerment Finding – a bedrock determination that underpins much of the federal government’s authority to curb greenhouse gas emissions.
“This report makes a mockery of science,” Professor Andrew Dessler, a climate scientist at Texas A&M University and one of the co-authors, wrote in a statement.
“It relies on ideas that were rejected long ago, supported by misrepresentations of the body of scientific knowledge, omissions of important facts, arm waving, anecdotes and confirmation bias. This report makes it clear DOE has no interest in engaging with the scientific community.”
Entitled “A Critical Review of Impacts of Greenhouse Gas Emissions on the US Climate”, the DOE document made sweeping claims: that extreme weather events linked to human-caused emissions were not increasing, US temperatures were not rising, and higher carbon dioxide levels would benefit agricultural productivity.
The rebuttal marshals experts from multiple disciplines to challenge each assertion.
“Contrary to the authors’ claims, the human-induced global warming signal is clearly discernible in all-time high and low temperature records over the continental United States and throughout the world,” scientists wrote in one example.
On agriculture, the rebuttal notes that while elevated carbon dioxide can sometimes spur greater yields in isolation, rising heat and shifting rainfall patterns are expected to cause overall declines.
The DOE report also downplays the threat of ocean acidification, stating that “life in the oceans evolved when the oceans were mildly acidic” billions of years ago.
But according to the rebuttal, this is “irrelevant for evaluating whether current or near-future conditions are suitable for modern ecosystems to continue”, since complex multicellular life had not evolved at the time.
Since returning to office in January, US President Donald Trump has gone far beyond the pro-fossil fuel agenda of his first term.
Republicans recently passed legislation titled the “Big Beautiful Bill”,
Mr Trump has also withdrawn the US from the Paris Agreement on climate
