Lawsuits challenge Trump’s executive orders over birthright citizenship and more

BOSTON – Immigrant and civil rights groups have filed the first lawsuits challenging

executive orders US President Donald Trump signed on Jan 20

after taking office, including one that seeks to roll back birthright citizenship in the US.

The lawsuits were filed in federal court in Massachusetts and New Hampshire late on Jan 20, ahead of expected legal challenges by several Democratic attorneys-general in states including California and Connecticut.

The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

More lawsuits by Democratic-led states and advocacy groups challenging other aspects of Mr Trump’s agenda are expected, with cases already on file taking aim at the Elon Musk-led Department of Government Efficiency, or Doge, and an order the Republican signed weakening job protections for civil servants.

The New England lawsuits took aim at a central piece of Mr Trump’s sweeping immigration crackdown, an order directing federal agencies not to recognise US citizenship for children born in the US to mothers who are in the country illegally or are present temporarily, such as visa holders, and whose fathers are not citizens or lawful permanent residents.

Just hours after Mr Trump was sworn into office, the American Civil Liberties Union and other groups filed the first lawsuit challenging the order in Concord, New Hampshire.

Another lawsuit was filed around midnight in Boston by an expectant mother and immigrant organisations.

Any rulings from those district court judges would be reviewed by the Boston-based First US Circuit Court of Appeals, whose five active federal judges are all appointees of Democratic presidents, a rarity nationally.

Both lawsuits argue that the executive order violated the right enshrined in the Citizenship Clause of the US Constitution’s 14th Amendment that provides that anyone born in the United States is considered a citizen.

Both lawsuits cite the US Supreme Court’s 1898 ruling in United States versus Wong Kim Ark, a decision holding that children born in the US to non-citizen parents are entitled to US citizenship.

Among the plaintiffs named in that lawsuit is a woman identified only as “O. Doe”, a Massachusetts resident who is in the country through temporary protected status and is due to give birth in March.

Temporary protected status is available to people whose home countries have experienced natural disasters, armed conflicts or other extraordinary events and currently covers more than one million people from 17 nations.

Several other lawsuits challenging aspects of Mr Trump’s other early executive actions are also pending.

The National Treasury Employees Union, which represents federal government employees in 37 agencies and departments, late on Jan 20 filed a lawsuit challenging an order Mr Trump signed that makes it easier to fire thousands of federal agency employees and replace them with political loyalists.

Several other lawsuits by government employee unions and public interest groups argued that the Department of Government Efficiency violates a federal transparency law. REUTERS