Lashing out over Russia and jobs data, Trump displays his volatile side

WASHINGTON - Despite slowing over the first half of the year, the US economy has remained reasonably healthy. Yet when the jobs report for July was released on Aug 1, showing a substantial slowdown in hiring, US President Donald Trump lashed out, claiming the figures were rigged and firing the head of the government agency that produces them.

Mr Dmitry Medvedev was once president of Russia, but now is little more than the Kremlin’s favourite online troll.

Yet when he got under Mr Trump’s skin with provocative posts about nuclear war, Mr Trump, already increasingly infuriated by Russian President Vladimir Putin’s unwillingness to work with him to end the war in Ukraine, responded on Aug 1 as if a real superpower conflict could be brewing,

ordering submarines into position

to guard against any threat.

Just days earlier, Mr Trump had returned to the US from a golf trip, happily flexing his political and diplomatic power.

A capitulating Congress had passed his signature domestic policy legislation, despite concerns over its deep cuts to the social safety net.

The European Union caved

to Mr Trump and his threat of tariffs by announcing a trade deal during the President’s trip to Scotland.

Emboldened, Mr Trump

moved ahead with sweeping tariffs

that could reshape the world economy.

But on Aug 1, Mr Trump, confronted with foes and facts that he could not easily control, displayed another side of himself, responding with disproportionate intensity and a distinct impatience.

His actions were part of a pattern in which he has shown growing intolerance towards those who will not bend to his will.

Mr Jerome Powell, the Federal Reserve chair who has

defied Mr Trump’s demands

for interest rate cuts, has been subject to withering and relentless criticism and insults from the President.

Mr Trump has assailed those of his own supporters who have refused to drop their demands for release of the Jeffrey Epstein files.

But his actions on Aug 1 were especially striking because they involved fiery reactions to two of the biggest issues on his plate.

Russia under Mr Putin, once viewed by Mr Trump as a partner in solving big problems, has left Mr Trump frustrated and facing mocking reminders of his pledge that he could bring the war in Ukraine to an end on his first day in office.

With Mr Putin now responding to Mr Trump’s peace efforts by launching more attacks and brushing off threats of further US sanctions, Mr Trump has turned against him – and on Aug 1 used his commander-in-chief powers to respond to baiting posts from one of Mr Putin’s online attack dogs.

Soon after disclosing on his social media platform that he had ordered nuclear submarines “to be positioned in the appropriate regions, just in case these foolish and inflammatory statements are more than just that”, Mr Trump fired the head of the Bureau of Labour Statistics, claiming that the employment numbers were being massaged to make him look bad.

“I think he deliberately surrounded himself with yes-men and yes-women,” said Mr John Bolton, a former national security adviser to Mr Trump.

“It’s more evidence he’s not fit to be president. This is not the way a president responds to either one of these situations.”

In firing the commissioner of the statistics bureau,

Ms Erika McEntarfer

, who was confirmed on a bipartisan basis in 2024, Mr Trump accused her of a long pattern of rigging the job numbers to hurt him before and after the 2024 election, a claim dismissed by economists across the political spectrum.

“I believe the numbers were phoney, just like they were before the election,” Mr Trump said as he left the White House on Aug 1.

“And there were other times. So you know what I did? I fired her, and you know what I did? The right thing.”

The move cemented many fears that Mr Trump, who has already fired inspectors-general and installed loyalists in the Justice Department, would eventually root out government officials who report politically inconvenient data or intimidate them from publicly disclosing bad news.

Dr William W. Beach, a former head of the Bureau of Labour Statistics who was nominated by Mr Trump during his first term, described the firing as “groundless” and warned that it sets “a dangerous precedent”.

“This escalates the President’s unprecedented attacks on the independence and integrity of the federal statistical system,” Dr Beach said in a joint statement with other statisticians. “The President seeks to blame someone for unwelcome economic news.”

Mr Trump similarly showed little caution earlier in the day in responding to Mr Medvedev, who had said in a social media post that Mr Trump should imagine the apocalyptic television series The Walking Dead and noted the Soviet Union’s system for launching a nuclear strike.

“Words are very important,” Mr Trump said. “And can often lead to unintended consequences. I hope this will not be one of those instances.”

Mr Bolton said it was the President who needed to show more discipline.

“He may not even understand what he’s doing,” Mr Bolton said. “It’s so natural to him to say outrageous things that he’s incapable of thinking about the strategic consequences.”

Having surrounded himself with aides unwilling to challenge his impulses, Mr Trump faces no constraints on lashing out impulsively, Mr Bolton said.

“Trump is not deterred by reality,” Mr Bolton said. “He just says what he wants to say.”

In attacking Mr Powell, the Fed chair, Mr Trump has sought to accuse him of mismanaging an expensive renovation of the central bank’s headquarters.

But when Mr Trump showed up at the building recently to make his case, Mr Powell, in a low-key but remarkable display of defiance, publicly challenged cost figures being cited by the President.

On Aug 1, with the

new jobs numbers suggesting

that the economy is slowing on Mr Trump’s watch, the President once again called on Mr Powell to resign. NYTIMES