Judge orders Trump administration to preserve Yemen attack plan messages
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox
The American Oversight group alleged that the use of Signal, which allows for messages to be automatically deleted after a certain time span, violated a federal record-keeping law.
PHOTO: REUTERS
Follow topic:
WASHINGTON - A US judge on March 27 ordered President Donald Trump’s administration to preserve messages sent on the Signal messaging app discussing attack plans against the Houthis in Yemen
The order from US District Judge James Boasberg requires federal agencies whose leaders participated in the chat, which included Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth and CIA director John Ratcliffe, to maintain all messages sent through Signal from March 11 until March 15, the period during which an editor for The Atlantic magazine documented activity in the chat.
A lawyer for the Trump administration earlier said federal agencies were already working to determine what records still existed so they could be preserved.
Attorney-General Pam Bondi said on March 27 that Judge Boasberg should not be on the Signal case and other cases involving the Trump administration, describing him as among several federal judges “trying to obstruct Donald Trump’s agenda”.
“He cannot be objective. He’s made that crystal clear,” Ms Bondi said during an interview on Fox News’ The Ingraham Angle show.
Mr Trump previously called for Judge Boasberg’s impeachment after the Washington-based judge temporarily blocked the administration from deporting some Venezuelan migrants.
An appeals court on March 26 upheld that ruling.
A representative of Judge Boasberg’s chambers did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Federal agencies involved in the Signal chat were sued on March 25 by American Oversight, a government accountability group.
The group alleged that the use of the application, which allows for messages to be automatically deleted after a certain time span, violated a federal record-keeping law.
“We are grateful for the judge’s bench ruling to halt any further destruction of these critical records. The public has a right to know how decisions about war and national security are made – and accountability doesn’t disappear just because a message was set to auto-delete,” Ms Chioma Chukwu, American Oversight’s interim executive director, said in a statement.
The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
The Atlantic magazine published on March 26 messages it said were exchanged in the group after Trump administration officials said they were not classified in an attempt to play down the impact of the breach.
The messages revealed discussions among senior national security officials about planned military strikes targeting the Houthi militant group.
Mr Hegseth shared information on the timing of attacks on March 15, including one aimed at someone identified in the chat as a terrorist, hours before the attack began, said the report.
The existence of the group chat, and the inadvertent disclosure of messages to a journalist, has sparked a brewing controversy over the Trump administration’s treatment of sensitive military and intelligence information.
The lawsuit was unrelated to the national security implications of the disclosure and instead focused on American Oversight’s claim that the messages should count as government records that agencies are legally required to preserve. REUTERS
