Judge denies government’s request to seal list of witnesses in Trump documents case
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox
The ruling means that some or all of the list of 84 witnesses could at some point become public.
PHOTO: REUTERS
Follow topic:
WASHINGTON – The federal judge overseeing former president Donald Trump’s prosecution on charges of illegally holding on to sensitive national security documents
The ruling by Judge Aileen Cannon, in the Southern District of Florida, means that some or all of the list of 84 witnesses could at some point become public, offering further details about the shape and scope of the case that special counsel Jack Smith has brought against Trump
The government’s request to keep the names of the witnesses secret “does not offer a particularised basis to justify sealing the list from public view”, Judge Cannon wrote in her brief order.
“It does not explain why partial sealing, redaction or means other than sealing are unavailable or unsatisfactory, and it does not specify the duration of any proposed seal.”
One of the conditions that a federal magistrate judge placed on Trump when he walked free from his arraignment in June was a provision prohibiting him from discussing the facts in his indictment
The indictment accused Trump of wilfully retaining 31 individual national security documents
While the identities of the witnesses remain unknown, many of them are believed to be aides and advisers close to Trump – among them, several who work or worked with him at Mar-a-Lago, his private club and residence in Florida
As part of the conditions the magistrate judge imposed, Trump was also barred from discussing the case with his co-defendant, Walt Nauta, who remains his personal aide.
Mr Peter Carr, a spokesman for Mr Smith, did not respond to messages seeking comment.
In a separate order issued on Monday, Judge Cannon asked Trump’s legal team to respond by July 6 to Mr Smith’s request to delay the start of the trial until Dec 11.
Judge Cannon also scheduled a hearing for July 14 for the parties to discuss how to handle the significant amount of highly sensitive material involved in the case under a law known as the Classified Information Procedures Act. That hearing will be conducted mostly, if not entirely, under seal. NYTIMES

