Johnson & Johnson reaches US$700m talc case settlement

Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox

The New Jersey-based company faced thousands of lawsuits over talcum powder containing traces of asbestos blamed for causing ovarian cancer.

The New Jersey-based company faced thousands of lawsuits over talcum powder containing traces of asbestos blamed for causing ovarian cancer.

REUTERS

Follow topic:

NEW YORK - US pharmaceutical and cosmetics giant Johnson & Johnson (J&J) has agreed to pay US$700 million (S$947 million) to settle allegations it misled customers about the safety of its talcum-based powder products, New York’s Attorney-General announced on June 11.

In its settlement with 42 states and the District of Columbia, J&J did not admit wrongdoing, even though it withdrew the products from the North American market in 2020.

The New Jersey-based company announced a settlement in principle in January after facing thousands of lawsuits over talcum powder containing traces of asbestos blamed for causing ovarian cancer.

“No amount of money can undo the pain caused by Johnson & Johnson’s talc-laced products, but today families can rest assured that the company is being held accountable for the harm it caused,” Attorney-General Letitia James said in a statement.

The state of New York will receive US$44 million of the settlement amount, which must be paid in four instalments over three years.

In a statement to AFP, J&J Worldwide vice-president of litigation Erik Haas said the company “continues to pursue several paths to achieve a comprehensive and final resolution of the talc litigation”.

The process “includes the finalisation of a previously announced agreement that the company reached with a consortium of 43 state attorneys-general to resolve their talc claims”.

In April 2023, the group proposed an US$8.9 billion agreement that would “equitably and efficiently resolve all claims arising from cosmetic talc litigation”.

J&J said the money would be paid to the tens of thousands of claimants over 25 years through a subsidiary, LTL Management, which was set up to address the claims and has filed for bankruptcy protection.

However, a bankruptcy judge rejected the arrangement.

“We will continue to address the claims of those who do not want to participate in our contemplated consensual bankruptcy resolution through litigation or settlement,” Mr Haas added in his statement on June 11.

A summary of studies published in January 2020 and covering 250,000 women in the United States did not find a statistical link between the use of talc on the genitals and the risk of ovarian cancer. AFP


See more on