In Chicago, locals prepare for Trump’s possible deployment of National Guard

CHICAGO - When US President Donald Trump threatened to flood Chicago with National Guard troops and Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents earlier in August, Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker said the president lacked the legal authority.

But privately, Mr Pritzker and Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson began discussing what they could do to shield Chicago from a federal deployment like those underway in two other Democrat-run cities with Black mayors, Los Angeles and Washington, D.C. Their conclusion: not much.

As Mr Trump has amped up the

threat of a federal deployment

in the nation’s third-largest city in recent days, public officials and community organisers said they are doing what they can to get ready, however.

The offices of Mr Pritzker and Mr Johnson are closely coordinating. The state’s attorney general, Mr Kwame Raoul, said on Aug 25 he was developing a legal strategy to execute if troops arrived. Immigrant advocates are stepping up legal training.

While some locals have expressed support for Mr Trump’s decision, many in the heavily Democratic-voting city are appalled.

Some community group leaders who work in Chicago neighborhoods most affected by violent crime said the presence of National Guard troops could undermine efforts to build trust. So would the appearance of cooperation between Chicago police officers and ICE, Chicago Police Superintendent Larry Snelling said.

At a press conference on Aug 28, Mr Snelling said that officers would not assist with federal law enforcement, but would not interfere with it either.

“We know people are living in fear,” he said, “and working with ICE, it does nothing to help those relationships and in fact, it hurts. We’re not going to ask for anyone’s immigration status, we don’t care. We’re going to continue to stand up for the people in our city to make sure that they’re safe.”

On Aug 25, Mr Pritzker spoke on the riverfront in downtown Chicago, flanked by Mr Johnson and the state’s most powerful Democrats.

“Mr. President, do not come to Chicago. You are neither wanted here nor needed here,” he said.

Chicago crime

Mr Trump has justified his decision by painting a bleak picture of crime in Chicago, calling it a “disaster”. Illinois Republicans have echoed that description, and are increasingly speaking up in support of Mr Trump’s pledged intervention.

Families “need leaders who will finally make Chicago safe,” state Senator Neil Anderson said in a statement to Reuters.

Chicago has long had a reputation as a city with an elevated crime rate, particularly around gun violence. There have been 1,229 shootings so far in 2025, including a high-profile drive-by shooting in July targeting a rap artist.

However, the city has made marked progress since the end of the pandemic, according to Chicago crime data. Fatal shootings fell 36 per cent from Jan 1 through Aug 25 compared to the same period in 2024. Its July homicide rate of 1.66 per 100,000 residents ranks it below Washington, New Orleans, Kansas City and Little Rock, Arkansas, among other cities.

The falling crime trend mirrors other US cities, reflecting the impact of hundreds of millions of federal dollars allocated in recent years for teachers, police and social workers – the people likely to influence at-risk youth most vulnerable to gun violence, said Mr John Roman, a senior fellow at the research organisation Norc at the University of Chicago.

Some of those funds, including US$158 million (S$202.6 million) in grants for violence prevention programs across the US, were cut in April as part of the Trump administration’s reshaping of government.

The federal funding cuts demonstrate that Mr Trump’s pledge to tackle crime in Chicago is “performative” and not his actual goal, said Mr Arne Duncan, former President Barack Obama’s Secretary of Education and founder of community violence prevention nonprofit Chicago CRED.

Sending the National Guard, Mr Duncan said, “harkens back to Klan patrols – that’s the imagery he wants and it’s incredibly disturbing. He wants these military clashes with civilians.”

The perception among outsiders and even many Chicagoans is that safety remains a serious issue. In a Norc survey this spring of city residents, about half said they felt unsafe in their neighbourhoods at night.

Ms Joleen Reese, an unemployed mother of four on Chicago’s South Side, said she feels “relatively safe”, but takes care to keep her children in at night. She said that deploying federal troops was “not called for”, and that she would prefer that Mr Trump focus on job creation.

But Mr Mike Wyatt, an IT worker in Chicago’s Loop, said he would welcome assistance addressing homelessness and empty storefronts downtown.

“We need some help,” he said.

Sanctuary city

Mr Trump has also singled out Chicago because of its so-called sanctuary city status for immigrants. From 2022, waves of migrants began arriving to Chicago from the border, mostly on buses sent by officials in Texas and other southern states. By the summer of 2024, the city had placed about 46,000 migrants in shelters.

South Side resident Danielle Carter-Walters, a spokesperson for the pro-Trump group Chicago Flips Red, testified at a US House of Representatives committee hearing in April that Chicago was “drowning with the consequences” of its sanctuary city status.

That spurred Mr Trump to say that Black Chicagoans had told him, “come to Chicago, please”.

The potential deployment of troops and ICE agents has sparked a wave of trepidation among immigrants, with even permanent residents and citizens with Latino heritage fearing a mistaken detention, said Ms Eréndira Rendón, vice-president of Immigrant Justice at The Resurrection Project.

This week, the group was scrambling to train its immigration lawyers in deportation litigation methods, and to hire more.

“We’re preparing for an escalation in enforcement and scare tactics,” she said.

The National Guard has been sent to Chicago before, but that involved coordination with local officials.

Although Mr Trump has indicated that he does not need to receive any formal request, his power to send in troops is limited under US law, and

his actions in Los Angeles

earlier this summer are still being litigated.

There are no restrictions on the deployment of federal law enforcement officers such as ICE agents, however.

City and state lawyers will likely argue that deploying the National Guard to Chicago would violate the US Constitution and a 19th century law that bars the military from civil law enforcement, said University of Chicago law professor Craig Futterman.

“A fundamental legal principle is we don’t turn our military on its own citizens,” Professor Futterman said.

Ms Denise Poloyac, a board member for the Chicago chapter of protest organisation Indivisible, said that a large federal presence would be met with nonviolent protest.

Such a move by Mr Trump, she said, would be a sign of growing authoritarianism intended to spark fear among Chicagoans.

“We’re not going to let that happen,” she said. REUTERS