How Tulsi Gabbard became a favourite of Russia’s state media

WASHINGTON - In 2017, when she was still a Democratic member of Congress, Ms Tulsi Gabbard travelled to Syria and met the country’s President Bashar al-Assad. She also accused the United States of supporting terrorists there.

The day after Mr Vladimir Putin began

a full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022

, Ms Gabbard blamed the US and North Atlantic Treaty Organisation for provoking the war by ignoring Russia’s security concerns.

She has since suggested that the US covertly worked with Ukraine on dangerous biological pathogens and was culpable for the bombing of the Nord Stream gas pipeline from Russia to Germany in September 2022.

European prosecutors and US officials say that sabotage was carried out by Ukrainian operatives.

Ms Gabbard’s comments have earned her sharp rebukes from officials across the political spectrum in Washington, who have accused her of parroting the anti-American propaganda of the country’s adversaries.

Her remarks have also made her a darling of the Kremlin’s vast state media apparatus – and, more recently, of US President-elect Donald Trump, who last week

picked her to oversee the nation’s 18 intelligence agencies

and departments.

Her selection to be the director of national intelligence has raised alarms among national security officials, not only because of her lack of experience in intelligence, but also because she has embraced a world view that mirrors disinformation straight out of the Kremlin’s playbook.

No evidence has emerged that she has ever collaborated in any way with Russia’s intelligence agencies.

Instead, according to analysts and former officials, Ms Gabbard seems to simply share the Kremlin’s geopolitical views, especially when it comes to the exercise of American military power.

In Russia, the reaction to her potential appointment has been gleeful, even if Mr Putin’s government remains wary of American policies, even under a second Trump administration.

“The CIA (Central Intelligence Agency) and the FBI (Federal Bureau of Investigation) are trembling,” Komsomolskaya Pravda, a Russian newspaper, wrote on Nov 15 in a glowing profile of Ms Gabbard, noting, positively, that Ukrainians consider her “an agent of the Russian state”.

Rossiya-1, a state television channel, called her a Russian “comrade” in Trump’s emerging Cabinet.

Russian media has emphasised Ms Gabbard’s desire to improve relations with Moscow, according to FilterLabs, a firm that analyses social media, state-run news organisations and other internet postings to track public sentiment in Russia.

“Gabbard fits an overall pattern of Trump breaking with much of the post-Cold War consensus,” said Mr Jonathan Teubner, the chief executive of FilterLabs. “She is, for Russia, the one that perhaps most perfectly embodies the changes they were hoping for from the US.”

Trump’s critics called the choice a dangerous one that would undermine national security and that signalled a deference to Mr Putin’s world view.

“Nominating Gabbard for director of national intelligence is the way to Putin’s heart, and it tells the world that America under Trump will be the Kremlin’s ally rather than an adversary,” New York University professor of history Ruth Ben-Ghiat, the author of Strongmen, a 2020 book about authoritarian leaders, wrote on Nov 15.

“And so we would have a national security official who would potentially compromise our national security.”

Asked for comment on Ms Gabbard’s pro-Russia stances and her amplification of Moscow’s messaging, Trump transition officials sent a copy of the President-elect’s comments when he announced his pick: “I know Tulsi will bring the fearless spirit that has defined her illustrious career to our intelligence community.”

If confirmed, she would have responsibility to oversee the very agency that monitored and called out Russian disinformation and influence efforts throughout the 2024 campaign.

She faces an uphill battle for confirmation in the Senate.

Among members from both parties, her tacit support of Russia’s war aims in Ukraine and her repetition of Kremlin disinformation have raised doubts about whether she should be given oversight of the intelligence agencies, including the responsibility of preparing the highly classified daily intelligence briefings for the returning President.

In choosing her, Trump signalled his deep distrust of those agencies.

During his first administration, he publicly rebuked senior intelligence officers when their assessments differed from his own.

Ms Gabbard’s iconoclastic views over the years suggest that she shares that distrust, especially when it comes to Russia and the war in Ukraine.

In several public appearances and in social media posts, she has outlined a policy not different from the views of Vice-President-elect J.D. Vance, who has also emerged as a critic of American support for Ukraine.

If confirmed, Ms Gabbard would not be the only voice on intelligence matters.

Mr John Ratcliffe, Trump’s final director of national intelligence in his first administration, has been chosen to be CIA director.

Ms Gabbard would, however, still be influential in determining what intelligence Trump and other top officials see in the daily intelligence briefing, and would be in a position to highlight intelligence that reinforces Trump’s views.

For Ms Gabbard, the invitation to join Trump’s administration represents a stunning political evolution.

Only four years ago, she sought the Democratic presidential nomination, albeit as an anti-establishment candidate, and

endorsed US President Joe Biden when he won the nod.

Since then, however, she has broken with the Democratic Party and drifted towards a conspiratorial view of the world and American power in it.

“This war and suffering could have easily been avoided if Biden Admin/Nato had simply acknowledged Russia’s legitimate security concerns regarding Ukraine’s becoming a member of Nato, which would mean US/Nato forces right on Russia’s border,” she wrote on Twitter, now known as X, when the war began in February 2022.

Her willingness to criticise the Biden administration has made her, like other prominent critics of the government, a favourite source of anti-American content on Russia’s state television networks.

Mr Vladimir Solovyov, a popular talk show host, called her “our girlfriend” in a segment in 2022.

The programme included an interview Mr Gabbard did with Mr Tucker Carlson in which she claimed that Mr Biden’s goal was to end Mr Putin’s control of the Russian government, according to Ms Julia Davis, the creator of the Russian Media Monitor, which tracks Kremlin propaganda.

In fact, Ms Gabbard honed her pro-Russia views on Mr Carlson’s show on Fox News before his programme was cancelled. She became a regular guest and occasionally filled in as host when Mr Carlson was away.

Clips from her appearances on Mr Carlson’s show that repeated Kremlin talking points were quickly picked up by Russian state media.

In some cases, she echoed story lines that Russia’s propagandists created, which the Russians then recycled on their own media as evidence that the conspiracy theories they had manufactured were true.

For the Kremlin, it was a virtuous cycle.

The frequency of her citations on Russian state television prompted sharp criticism and attention inside the US government.

Mrs Hillary Clinton, the former first lady, secretary of state and Democratic presidential nominee in 2016, once called her a “Russian asset”.

By 2024, Ms Gabbard’s politics had converged with Trump’s. In October, she joined the Republican Party and hit the campaign trail on his behalf, extolling him as a peacemaker.

“A vote for Donald Trump is a vote for a man who wants to end wars, not start them,” she said at Trump’s rally at Madison Square Garden shortly before election day, “and who has demonstrated already that he has the courage and strength to stand up and fight for peace”. NYTIMES