Former FBI chief Comey criminally charged as Trump targets critics

Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox

The effort to target Mr Comey had been viewed with scepticism in the Eastern District of Virginia, the US attorney’s office handling the case.

Mr James Comey served as FBI director from 2013 until 2017, when he was fired by US President Donald Trump early in his first term in office.

PHOTO: DOUG MILLS/NYTIMES

Follow topic:

WASHINGTON – The US Justice Department filed criminal charges against former FBI director James Comey on Sept 25, in a dramatic escalation of

President Donald Trump’s retribution campaign

against his political enemies.

If convicted, Comey could face up to five years in prison. He faces charges of making false statements and obstructing a congressional investigation.

Comey, in a video posted on Instagram, said: “My heart is broken for the Department of Justice, but I have great confidence in the federal judicial system, and I’m innocent. So, let’s have a trial and keep the faith.”

His attorney, Mr Patrick J. Fitzgerald, said in a statement: “Jim Comey denies the charges filed today in their entirety. We look forward to vindicating him in the courtroom.”

Mr Trump has threatened to imprison his political rivals since he first ran for president in 2015, but the indictment on Sept 25 marks the first time his administration has succeeded in securing a grand jury indictment against one of them.

Mr Trump’s Justice Department is also investigating other antagonists including New York Attorney-General Letitia James and Mr John Bolton, who served as a national security official in Mr Trump’s first term as president.

The charges breach decades-long norms that have sought to insulate US law enforcement from political pressures.

The federal prosecutor in Virginia who had been tasked with pursuing the case resigned last week after drawing Mr Trump’s wrath for expressing doubts about the case, and others in the office have privately said the evidence does not merit criminal charges, according to sources familiar with the matter.

Mr Trump, who has pressured Attorney-General Pam Bondi to prosecute Comey and other critics, celebrated the news. “JUSTICE IN AMERICA!” he wrote on social media. “He has been so bad for our Country, for so long.”

Mr Trump fired Comey in 2017, early in his first term in office. He has since

regularly assailed Comey’s

handling of the FBI investigation that detailed contacts between Russians and Mr Trump’s 2016 campaign.

Since Mr Trump returned to office in January, the Justice Department has been examining Comey’s 2020 testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee when he addressed Republican criticisms of the Russia investigation and denied that he had authorised disclosures of sensitive information to the news media.

The indictment alleges that Comey misled Congress by claiming he had not authorised anyone else to be an anonymous source in news reporting about an FBI investigation.

Mr Trump’s administration has carried out a sweeping campaign to remake the Justice Department, which the president alleges was used as a political weapon when he left office in 2021.

Mr Trump faced federal charges of mishandling classified documents and trying to overturn his 2020 election defeat. Both cases have been dropped.

“Donald Trump has ordered the criminal prosecutions of political targets, and the Department of Justice is corruptly obeying,” said Mr Norm Eisen, a prominent former government ethics official under Democratic President Barack Obama and currently a fellow at the Brookings Institution.

“This indictment has all the hallmarks of a vindictive and meritless prosecution.”

Tensions within Justice Department

The effort to target Comey had been viewed with scepticism in the Eastern District of Virginia, the US attorney’s office handling the case.

After the district’s top federal prosecutor, Mr Erik Siebert, resigned last week, others in the office told his successor, Ms Lindsey Halligan, that charges should not be filed due to a lack of evidence, according to a source.

Career prosecutors in the office also previously drafted a memo urging Ms Halligan not to seek an indictment, saying the case lacked evidence to establish probable cause that a crime was committed, Reuters previously reported.

Underscoring the weakness of the case, the grand jury on Sept 25 declined to indict Comey on a third proposed charge, originally listed as count one of the indictment, of making a false statement to Congress in a different part of his Senate testimony stemming from a question related to the 2016 presidential election, court records show.

Ms Halligan most recently served as a White House adviser, and before that was one of Mr Trump’s personal defence lawyers.

In a highly unusual move, Ms Halligan personally presented the evidence to the grand jury on Sept 25 – a task typically performed by a line prosecutor and not the US Attorney, according to four people briefed on the matter.

Comey’s son-in-law, Mr Troy Edwards resigned from his position as a senior national security prosecutor following the news on Sept 25, saying he was doing so in order to uphold his “oath to the Constitution and country”, according to a copy of his resignation letter seen by Reuters.

Comey’s eldest daughter, Ms Maureen Comey, was fired from her job as a federal prosecutor in Manhattan in July.

She filed a lawsuit earlier in September, with her lawyers saying in the complaint that she was fired “solely or substantially because her father is former FBI director James B. Comey”.

Mr Trump and Comey have had an acrimonious relationship since the start of the president’s first term.

Mr Trump fired him as FBI director days after Comey publicly confirmed that the president was under investigation over his election campaign’s connections to Russia.

Comey then emerged as a prominent critic of the president, calling him “morally unfit” for office.

Comey’s firing led to the appointment of another former FBI chief, Mr Robert Mueller, being appointed as a special counsel to take charge of the Russia probe, which unearthed numerous contacts between the campaign and Russian officials, but concluded that there was not enough evidence to establish a criminal conspiracy.

Mr Trump has repeatedly attacked the investigation as a “witch hunt”. His second administration has sought to undermine conclusions by US intelligence and law enforcement agencies about Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election in which he defeated his Democratic rival Hillary Clinton. REUTERS

See more on