Elon Musk renews firing threat after being stymied by federal officials
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox
The directive sparked widespread confusion across the federal government.
PHOTO: BLOOMBERG
Follow topic:
WASHINGTON - Mr Elon Musk, US President Donald Trump’s point person to root out what he says is government waste, on Feb 24 renewed his threat to fire federal workers who do not comply with his demand to justify their jobs, even after the Trump administration said workers did not have to respond.
The US agency that oversees federal employees said on Feb 24 they could ignore a weekend e-mail from Mr Musk that required them to summarise their work
The directive sparked widespread confusion across the federal government and raised questions about how much actual authority Mr Musk, the world’s richest man, possesses within the administration.
As the deadline for response grew near on Feb 24, Mr Musk, whom Mr Trump appointed to head up a newly named Department of Government Efficiency (Doge) that Mr Trump has tasked to radically downsize the government, seemed to acknowledge that his plan had run aground.
“The e-mail request was utterly trivial, as the standard for passing the test was to type some words and press send!” Mr Musk posted on X, the social media site he owns. “Yet so many failed even that inane test, urged on in some cases by their managers.”
Mr Musk went on to say: “Subject to the discretion of the President, they will be given another chance. Failure to respond a second time will result in termination.”
The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Mr Musk’s remarks.
It was unclear whether Mr Musk was aware of the guidance the US Office of Personnel Management (OPM) released earlier on Feb 24 telling human resources officials at federal agencies that employees would not be let go for not replying to Mr Musk’s e-mail – nor were staff required to respond to it.
The memo said responding to the e-mail was voluntary. It also urged employees not to share confidential, sensitive or classified information in their responses, a concern of critics of Mr Musk’s action.
Even after that guidance was issued, some agencies nudged their employees to respond.
A senior manager at the General Services Administration (GSA), which manages federal buildings, told employees that the agency was still encouraging workers to answer the e-mail even if it was voluntary, according to a GSA source.
Similarly, the acting director of OPM itself sent an e-mail to the agency’s staff that said responding with bullet points was voluntary “but strongly encouraged”.
Resistance to Musk’s order
The Department of Health and Human Services advised employees that if they chose to reply, they should keep their responses general in nature and that they should refrain from identifying specific drugs or contracts they are working on, according to an e-mail reviewed by Reuters.
“Assume that what you write will be read by malign foreign actors and tailor your response accordingly,” the e-mail said.
Mr Musk’s downsizing initiative, Doge, has rippled into the wider US economy as well, forcing companies that do business with the government to lay off workers and defer payments to vendors.
Mr Musk’s message on Feb 22 took some administration officials by surprise, according to two sources familiar with the situation.
Adding to the confusion, Mr Trump stood by Mr Musk.
“I thought it was great,” he told reporters at the White House earlier on Feb 24. “There was a lot of genius in sending it. We’re trying to find out if people were working.”
In other Feb 24 action, a federal judge blocked the government downsizing team created by Mr Trump and led by Mr Musk from accessing sensitive data maintained by the US Education Department and the OPM.
Unlike Cabinet appointees and appointees to head up independent federal agencies, Mr Musk’s appointment required no approval by the US Senate.
Unions sue over Musk e-mail
Also on Feb 24, a group of labour unions that have asked a federal judge to stop the mass firings updated their lawsuit to request that Mr Musk’s e-mail be ruled illegal.
Prior to the OPM directive, senior officials at the Department of Justice, as well as the Departments of Defence, State and Homeland Security and several other agencies had told workers not to respond outside their established chain of command.
The Transportation Department, the Treasury Department and independent agencies like the Federal Trade Commission and the Federal Communications Commission have told employees to answer Mr Musk’s message.
Mr Musk has revelled in the upheaval, even wielding a chainsaw at a conservative political conference
In addition, his e-mail was sent to political appointees at the White House who presumably would not be viewed with suspicion by the President, according to two sources.
It also was sent to federal judges and other employees of the court system, who make up a separate branch of government and do not answer to the administration.
More than 20,000 workers have been laid off as part of the downsizing effort.
The confusion echoed the broader turmoil surrounding Mr Trump’s return to power.
Since taking office on Jan 20, Mr Trump has frozen billions of dollars in foreign assistance and effectively dismantled the US Agency for International Development
Mr Trump has ordered employees of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau to cease working, though they also received Mr Musk’s e-mail asking that they outline their work activities over the past week.
The Trump administration has separately offered buyouts to 75,000 workers.
In some cases, the government has scrambled to rehire workers who perform critical functions like nuclear weapons oversight and bird flu response. The downsizing has prompted a wave of lawsuits. REUTERS
