Dismay and disbelief as Trump bans visitors from a dozen countries

Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox

US President Donald Trump signed a proclamation on June 4 barring citizens of 12 countries from entering the US starting on June 9.

US President Donald Trump signed a proclamation on June 4 barring citizens of 12 countries from entering the US starting June 9.

PHOTO: AFP

Follow topic:

- Officials and residents in countries whose citizens will soon be banned from visiting the US expressed dismay and disbelief on June 5 at President Donald Trump’s new sweeping travel ban as his administration intensifies its immigration crackdown.

Mr Trump signed a proclamation on June 4

barring citizens of 12 countries

from entering the US starting on June 9, asserting that the restrictions were necessary to protect against “foreign terrorists”.

The order was reminiscent of a similar move Mr Trump implemented during his first term in office from 2017 to 2021, when he barred travellers from seven Muslim-majority nations.

That directive faced court challenges and went through several iterations before the US Supreme Court upheld the ban in 2018.

Former president Joe Biden, a Democrat who succeeded Mr Trump, repealed that ban in 2021, calling it “a stain on our national conscience”.

But the new ban is much more expansive and covers Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen.

Citizens of seven other countries – Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela – will be partially restricted.

A senior diplomat with the Sudanese Foreign Ministry, who asked not to be named, said Mr Trump’s justification did not stand up to scrutiny.

“Sudanese people have never been known to pose a terrorist threat anywhere in the world,” the official said.

Chad President Mahamat Idriss Deby Itno said he had instructed his government to stop granting visas to US citizens in response to Mr Trump’s action.

“Chad has neither planes to offer nor billions of dollars to give, but Chad has its dignity and its pride,” he said in a Facebook post, referring to countries such as Qatar, which

gifted the US a luxury plane for Mr Trump’s use

and promised to invest billions of dollars in the US.

Afghans who worked for the US or US-funded projects and were hoping to resettle in the US expressed fear that the travel ban would force them to return to their country, where they could face reprisal from the Taliban.

Ms Fatima, a 57-year-old Afghan women’s rights defender waiting in Pakistan for her US visa to be processed, had her dreams shattered overnight after Mr Trump’s order.

“Unfortunately, the decisions made by President Trump turned all the hopes and beliefs of ours into ashes,” she told Reuters, asking that only her first name be published for security reasons.

‘Harbouring terrorists’

Mr Trump said the countries subject to the most severe restrictions were determined to harbour a “large-scale presence of terrorists”, fail to cooperate on visa security, have an inability to verify travellers’ identities, as well as have inadequate record-keeping of criminal histories and high rates of visa overstays in the US.

He cited a June 1 incident in Boulder, Colorado, in which an Egyptian national

tossed a petrol bomb into a crowd of pro-Israel demonstrators

as an example of why the new curbs are needed. But Egypt was not part of the travel ban.

“Because Egypt has been a country that we deal with very closely. They have things under control,” Mr Trump told reporters in the Oval Office on June 5.

When asked why he chose this moment to unveil the ban, he said: “It can’t come soon enough.”

The visa ban takes effect on June 9 at 12.01am Eastern Daylight Time (12.01pm in Singapore). Visas issued before that date will not be revoked, the order said.

In total, just under 162,000 immigrant visas and temporary work, study and travel visas were issued in fiscal year 2023 to nationals of the affected countries in the now banned visa categories, according to the Migration Policy Institute.

The ban is likely to face legal challenges. But retired professor of immigration law Stephen Yale-Loehr of Cornell Law School said he expected those lawsuits to face an uphill climb, because the latest ban contains various exemptions and cited specific security concerns with each country.

The ban includes exemptions, such as for dual nationals, permanent residents, immigrant visas for immediate family members of US citizens and athletes travelling for major sporting events like the World Cup.

"Trump has learnt from the mistakes of earlier travel bans," he said.

Some foreign officials said they were prepared to work with the US to address Mr Trump’s security concerns.

“Somalia values its longstanding relationship with the United States and stands ready to engage in dialogue to address the concerns raised,” Mr Dahir Hassan Abdi, the Somali Ambassador to the US, said in a statement. REUTERS

See more on