Columbia University agrees to Trump’s demands in attempt to restore funding

NEW YORK - Columbia University agreed to some changes demanded by US President Donald Trump’s administration before it can negotiate to regain federal funding that was pulled in March over

allegations the school tolerated anti-Semitism on campus

.

The Ivy League university in New York City acquiesced to several demands in a 4,000-word message from its interim president released on March 21. It laid out plans to reform its disciplinary process, hire security officers with arrest powers and appoint a new official with a broad remit to review departments that offer courses on the Middle East.

Columbia’s dramatic concessions to the government’s extraordinary demands, which stem from protests that convulsed the Manhattan campus over the Israel-Gaza war, immediately prompted criticism.

The outcome could have broad ramifications as the Trump administration has warned at least 60 other universities of similar action.

What Columbia would do with its Middle Eastern, South Asian, and African Studies (MESAAS) department was among the biggest questions facing the university as it confronted the cancellation, called unconstitutional by legal and civil groups, of hundreds of millions of dollars in government grants and contracts.

The Trump administration had told the school to place the department under academic receivership for at least five years, taking control away from its faculty.

Academic receivership is a rare step taken by a university’s administrators to fix a dysfunctional department by appointing a professor or administrator outside the department to take over.

Columbia did not refer to the receivership in its message on March 21.

The university said it would appoint a new senior administrator to review leadership and to ensure programs are balanced at MESAAS, the Middle East Institute, the Centre for Palestine Studies, the Institute for Israel and Jewish Studies and other departments with Middle East programmes, along with Columbia’s satellite hubs in Tel Aviv and Amman.

‘Terrible precedent’

Professor Jonathan Zimmerman, an education historian at the University of Pennsylvania and a “proud” graduate of Columbia, called it a sad day for the university.

“Historically, there is no precedent for this,” Prof Zimmerman said. “The government is using the money as a cudgel to micromanage a university.”

Professor Todd Wolfson, a Rutgers University don and president of the American Association of University Professors, called Mr Trump’s demands “arguably the greatest incursion into academic freedom, freedom of speech and institutional autonomy that we’ve seen since the McCarthy era”.

“It sets a terrible precedent,” Prof Wolfson said. “I know every academic faculty member in this country is angry about Columbia University’s inability to stand up to a bully.”

In a campus-wide e-mail, Columbia’s interim president Katrina Armstrong wrote that the priorities were “to advance our mission, ensure uninterrupted academic activities, and make every student, faculty, and staff member safe and welcome on our campus”.

Mr Mohammad Hemeida, an undergraduate who chairs Columbia’s Student Governing Board, said the school should have sought more student and faculty input.

“It’s incredibly disappointing Columbia gave in to government pressure instead of standing firm on the commitments to students and to academic freedom, which they emphasised to us in almost daily e-mails,” he said.

The White House did not respond to Columbia’s memo as at March 21. The Trump administration said its demands, laid out in a letter to Dr Armstrong eight days ago, were a precondition before Columbia could enter “formal negotiations” with the government to have federal funding.

Arrest powers

Columbia’s response is being watched by other universities that the administration has targeted as it advances its policy objectives in areas ranging from campus protests to transgender sports and diversity initiatives.

Private companies, law firms and other organisations have also faced threatened cuts in government funding and business unless they agree to adhere more closely to Mr Trump’s priorities. Powerful Wall Street law firm Paul Weiss came under heavy criticism on March 21 over a deal it struck with the White House to escape an executive order imperilling its business.

Columbia has come under particular scrutiny for the pro-Palestinian student protest movement that roiled its campus in 2024, when its lawns filled with tent encampments and noisy rallies against the US government’s support of Israel.

To some of the Trump administration’s demands, such as having “time, place and manner” rules around protests, the school suggested they had already been met.

Columbia said it had already sought to hire peace officers with arrest powers before the Trump administration’s demand last week, saying 36 new officers had nearly completed the lengthy training and certification process under New York law.

The university said no one was allowed to wear face masks on campus if they were doing so intending to break rules or laws. The ban does not apply to face masks worn for medical or religious purposes, and the university did not say it was adopting the Trump administration’s demand that Columbia ID be worn visibly on clothing.

The sudden shutdown of millions of dollars in federal funding to Columbia in March was already disrupting medical and scientific research at the school, researchers said.

Cancelled projects included the development of an artificial intelligence tool that helps nurses detect the deterioration of a patient’s health in hospital and research on uterine fibroids, non-cancerous tumours that can cause pain and affect women’s fertility. REUTERS