Boeing checks hit paperwork snag; US investigators search for missing part
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox
The door plug tore off the left side of an Alaska Airlines jet following takeoff from Portland, Oregon, en route to Ontario, California.
PHOTO: REUTERS
Follow topic:
WASHINGTON – Safety checks on some Boeing jets hit a snag over paperwork on Jan 7, as the US authorities searched for a missing panel that blew off a new Boeing 737 Max 9 jet
The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on Jan 6 ordered the temporary grounding of 171 Boeing jets installed with the same panel after the eight-week-old Alaska Airlines jet was forced to make an emergency landing with a gap in the fuselage.
“They will remain grounded until the FAA is satisfied that they are safe,” the agency said in a statement on Jan 7.
The door plug tore off the left side of an Alaska Airlines jet following take-off from Portland, Oregon, en route to Ontario, California, forcing pilots to turn back and land safely with all 171 passengers and six crew on board.
The force of the decompression was so strong that it blew open the cockpit door, according to a person briefed on the investigation.
The accident has put Boeing back under scrutiny as it awaits certification of its smaller Max 7 as well as the larger Max 10, which is needed to compete with a key Airbus model.
On Jan 6, the FAA initially said the required inspections would take four to eight hours, leading many in the industry to assume the planes could very quickly return to service.
But criteria for the checks have yet to be agreed between the FAA and Boeing, meaning airlines have yet to receive detailed instructions, people familiar with the matter said.
The FAA must approve Boeing’s inspection criteria before inspections can be completed and planes can resume flights.
Of the 171 planes covered by the order, 144 are operating in the United States, according to data from aviation analytics firm Cirium. Turkish Airlines, Panama’s Copa Airlines and Aeromexico said they were grounding affected jets.
Typically, whenever planemakers order routine maintenance checks, they get paperwork approved by regulators in advance.
But because the response to the unexpected Alaska Airlines incident was relatively swift, Boeing has not yet secured FAA approval to tell airlines how to carry out the regulator’s order.
The FAA has the final word on how the order is implemented.
Alaska Airlines said on Jan 7 that it was “just waiting for the direction from the FAA and Boeing so our inspections can begin”. The airline cancelled 170 flights, affecting nearly 25,000 customers, and said travel disruptions from the grounding were expected to last until at least midweek.
United Airlines cancelled 230 flights on Jan 7, or 8 per cent of scheduled departures, after parking all 79 of its 737 Max 9s awaiting the inspection directions.
“We’ve begun steps such as removing the inner panel to access the emergency door, and begun preliminary inspections while awaiting final instructions,” United said in a statement.
Boeing declined to comment on whether it had submitted its inspection criteria to the FAA, which had no further comment.
In a message to employees on Jan 7, Boeing chief executive Dave Calhoun said the company’s response to the accident must be the team’s focus right now.
“When serious accidents like this occur, it is critical for us to work transparently with our customers and regulators to understand and address the causes of the event, and to ensure they don’t happen again,” Mr Calhoun said.
The company plans to hold a companywide webcast on safety on Jan 9 to address its response. It also cancelled a leadership summit for company vice-presidents previously scheduled for Jan 8 and 9.
It is too early to say what caused Jan 5’s event, National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) chairwoman Jennifer Homendy told reporters on Jan 6.
The aircraft panel is likely to have landed somewhere in the western suburbs of Portland, but has not yet been found.
The NTSB has asked the public for help in finding the panel and also plans to ask commercial property owners to check the rooftops of industrial buildings in the area.
The extra exit door is typically installed by low-cost airlines using more seats that require additional evacuation routes. However, those doors are plugged on jets with fewer seats, like the Alaska Airlines plane. To passengers, the area looks like a normal window seat.
A cellphone that may have blown out of the plane was located on Jan 7 in the search area, according to the person familiar with the investigation.
In 2019, global authorities subjected all Max planes to a wider grounding that lasted 20 months after crashes in Ethiopia and Indonesia linked to poorly designed cockpit software killed a total of 346 people.
Boeing has delivered 214 of the 737 Max 9 model, or 15 per cent of the more than 1,300 Max aircraft in service, most of which can still fly, including Max 9 jets with ordinary doors instead of the replacement panels.
The fuselage for Boeing 737s is made by Kansas-based Spirit AeroSystems, which also manufactured and installed the plug that suffered the blowout.
But sources familiar with the process said Boeing also has a potential role, since it typically removes the semi-fitted door panel after receiving the fuselages by rail from Spirit. It uses the gap to feed in cabin equipment and speed up production before completing final installation.
Spirit referred questions to Boeing, which did not respond to a request for comment on who carried out the final installation. REUTERS