Bloomberg disciplines journalists over broken embargo on prisoner swop article

Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox

Bloomberg News incorrectly reported on Aug 1 that journalist Evan Gershkovich had already been released.

Bloomberg News incorrectly reported early on Aug 1 that journalist Evan Gershkovich had already been released in a prisoner exchange.

PHOTO: BLOOMBERG

Follow topic:

NEW YORK – Bloomberg News has disciplined multiple journalists involved in breaking an embargo last week tied to

a major prisoner swop,

in what its top editor said was “a clear violation of the editorial standards”.

Mr John Micklethwait, the newsroom’s editor-in-chief, said in an e-mail to its staff that Bloomberg disciplined the people after an investigation by the organisation’s standards editor into how the embargo, which was set by the Biden administration, was broken.

He said Bloomberg would be reviewing its processes “to ensure that failures like this don’t happen again”.

The e-mail did not specify what the disciplinary actions were or who they involved.

Bloomberg published an article at 7.41am on Aug 1 detailing the complicated prisoner exchange that resulted in the release of Mr Evan Gershkovich, a reporter for The Wall Street Journal, and many others.

Ms Jennifer Jacobs, a senior White House reporter who had the first byline on the article, has left the company, according to two people with knowledge of the matter.

An editor involved in the story was demoted, according to two other people.

Ms Jacobs said in a statement posted on social media on Aug 5 that “the idea that I would jeopardise the safety of a fellow reporter is deeply upsetting on a level that’s difficult to describe”.

She said she worked with her editors while reporting on Mr Gershkovich’s release, adhering to editorial guidelines and standards.

“At no time did I do anything that was knowingly inconsistent with the administration’s embargo or that would put anyone involved at risk,” Ms Jacobs wrote.

She added that reporters do not have the final say over when an article is published or what headline it is given.

A Bloomberg News spokesman declined to comment.

Numerous US news outlets, including The New York Times, learnt details about the swop from government officials before it happened, under the condition that the organisations could not publish the news until the prisoners were safely out of Russian hands and in US custody.

The Bloomberg article initially said, incorrectly, that the Americans had already been released. It was updated about an hour later with an editors’ note correcting the error.

Mr Micklethwait, in his e-mail to the staff on Aug 5, said the article was “prematurely published” and could have endangered the swop.

“Even if our story mercifully ended up making no difference, it was a clear violation of the editorial standards, which have made this newsroom so trusted around the world,” he wrote.

Mr Micklethwait said in his e-mail that he apologised on Aug 1 to Ms Emma Tucker, The Wall Street Journal’s editor-in-chief, and that he wrote to each of the prisoners to personally apologise.

“We publish thousands of stories every day, many of which break news,” Mr Micklethwait wrote. “We take accuracy very seriously. But we also have a responsibility to do the right thing. In this case, we didn’t.” NYTIMES

See more on