Democrats’ two-step infrastructure plan draws Republican ire

President Joe Biden leads a bipartisan group of senators out of the West Wing after an infrastructure package meeting at the White House on June 24, 2021. PHOTO: NYTIMES

WASHINGTON (REUTERS, BLOOMBERG) - Hours after US President Joe Biden declared "we have a deal" to renew the nation's infrastructure, the Senate's top Republican lashed out at plans to follow the US$1.2 trillion (S$1.61 trillion) bipartisan Bill with another measure addressing what Democrats call "human infrastructure."

Mr Biden and top congressional Democrats - House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer - had long signalled their plan to link the bipartisan deal with another measure including spending on home healthcare and child care in an infrastructure Bill.

The second measure would be passed through a Senate manoeuvre called reconciliation, which would allow it to take effect without Republican votes.

"I expect that in the coming months this summer, before the fiscal year is over, that we will have voted on this (bipartisan) Bill - the infrastructure Bill - as well as voted on the budget resolution," Mr Biden told reporters at the White House.

"But if only one comes to me, I'm not signing it. It's in tandem."

That drew a harsh response from Republican Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell.

"Less than two hours after publicly commending our colleagues and actually endorsing the bipartisan agreement, the President took the extraordinary step of threatening to veto it," Mr McConnell said on the Senate floor. "It almost makes your head spin."

Mr McConnell, Ms Pelosi and Mr Schumer have not been directly involved with the bipartisan infrastructure talks.

Mr McConnell has not publicly stated if he would back the initiative, though he called it "encouraging" in his floor remarks.

Mr Lindsey Graham, one of the 21 senators who had negotiated the bipartisan deal, said in a tweet: "If reports are accurate that President Biden is refusing to sign a bipartisan deal unless reconciliation is also passed, that would be the ultimate deal breaker for me."

It isn't immediately clear if Democrats Joe Manchin of West Virginia and Kyrsten Sinema of Arizona, two architects of the bipartisan plan, will support the reconciliation bill.

Mr Manchin on Thursday said that a reconciliation bill is inevitable, but he indicated he can't support one as big as the US$6 trillion that Senate Budget Chair Bernie Sanders has said he'll draft.

"I don't think we can take much more debt," Mr Manchin said.

The reconciliation bill is expected to address Mr Biden's campaign promises to expand federal support for child care, access to community college and elderly care - issues the president called "human infrastructure."

To try to appease progressives, Mr Biden promised not to sign either bill alone.

"I'm not going to rest until both get to my desk," he added.

Democratic lawmakers are under pressure to pass all of the major pieces of legislation by early fall, before members of Congress shift their focus to the 2022 midterm elections.

The Biden White House views the number of jobs created by any infrastructure deal as a major part of its economic message to voters.

A senior White House official said the infrastructure spending will add to the country's economic growth, while creating good, union-paying jobs.

The official declined to specify the number of jobs the infrastructure deal will create, though a White House statement said it would be in the "millions."

Remote video URL

The US$1.2 trillion framework includes US$579 billion in new spending on major investments in the nation's power grid, broadband Internet services and passenger and freight rail.

The eight-year proposal contains US$109 billion for roads, bridges and major projects; US$73 billion for power infrastructure; US$66 billion for passenger and freight rail; US$65 billion for broadband access; US$49 billion for public transit; and US$25 billion for airports, according to a White House statement.

The investments would be paid for through more than a dozen funding mechanisms, including US$100 billion in estimated tax revenues from a ramp-up in enforcement by the Internal Revenue Service, unused Covid-19 aid money, unemployment insurance funds returned by US states, and oil sales from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve.

The phrase "infrastructure week" became a Washington punchline during Mr Donald Trump's four years as president after he promised to make such legislation a centrepiece but did not unveil a plan for Congress to consider, including financing mechanisms for projects.

Mr Schumer said he supported the outline of the deal but wanted to see the details.

He also noted that the US$1.2 trillion Bill focused on physical infrastructure would not get the Democratic votes needed to pass it without an accompanying package tackling social issues, including home healthcare.

"All parties understand, we won't get enough votes to pass either, unless we have enough votes to pass both," Mr Schumer said on the Senate floor.

He said the Senate would aim for a vote on the bipartisan plan next month.

Ms Pelosi said the House would vote on the bipartisan Bill only after the Senate had also approved the additional reconciliation Bill.

That could mean that the battle over the massive Bills could extend into September and beyond.

Mr Biden, seeking to fuel economic growth and address income inequality after the coronavirus pandemic, initially proposed spending about US$2.3 trillion.

Republicans chafed at his definition of infrastructure, which included fighting climate change and providing care for children and the elderly.

The White House later trimmed the package to about US$1.7 trillion in an unsuccessful bid to win the Republican support needed for any plan to get the 60 votes required to advance most legislation in the evenly split 100-seat Senate.

Remote video URL

A major sticking point had been how to pay for the investments.

Mr Biden has pledged not to increase taxes on Americans earning less than US$400,000 a year, while Republicans are determined to protect a 2017 cut in corporate taxes.

Republican Senator John Thune said there were questions about whether watchdogs, including the Congressional Budget Office, would recognise some of the funding mechanisms as achieving savings.

Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.