After Harvard rejects US demands, Trump demands apology and adds a new threat

Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox

People gather around the John Harvard Statue on the Harvard University campus in Cambridge, Massachussetts, on April 15.

US President Donald Trump may strip Harvard of its tax-exempt status.

PHOTO: AFP

Follow topic:

- US President Donald Trump threatened to

strip Harvard

of its tax-exempt status on April 15 and said the university should apologise, a day after it rejected what it called unlawful demands to overhaul academic programmes or lose federal grants.

Beginning with Columbia University,

the Trump administration has rebuked universities across the country over their handling of the

pro-Palestinian student protest movement that roiled campuses in 2024

following the 2023 Hamas-led attack inside Israel and the subsequent Israeli attacks on Gaza.

Mr Trump has called the protests anti-American and anti-Semitic, accused universities of peddling Marxism and “radical left” ideology, and promised to end federal grants and contracts to universities that do not agree to his administration’s demands.

He said in a social media post on April 15 that he was mulling over whether to seek to end Harvard’s tax-exempt status if it continued pushing what he called “political, ideological, and terrorist inspired/supporting ‘Sickness?’”

He did not say how he would do this. Under the US tax code, most universities are exempt from federal income tax because they are deemed to be “operated exclusively” for public educational purposes.

White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters Mr Trump wanted to see Harvard apologise for what she called “anti-Semitism that took place on its college campus against Jewish American students”.

She accused Harvard and other schools of violating Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, which prohibits discrimination by recipients of federal funding based on race or national origin.

Under Title VI, federal funds can be terminated only after a lengthy investigation and hearings process and a 30-day notification to Congress, which has not happened at Columbia or Harvard.

Some professors and students have said the protests are being unfairly conflated with anti-Semitism as a pretext for an unconstitutional attack on academic freedoms.

Columbia, a private school in New York City, agreed to negotiations over demands to tighten its protest rules

after the Trump administration said in March that it had terminated grants and contracts worth US$400 million (S$527 million), mostly for medical and other scientific research.

Harvard president Alan Garber, in an April 14 letter, said demands the Trump administration made of the Massachusetts university, including an audit to ensure the “viewpoint diversity” of its students and faculty and an end to diversity, equity and inclusion programmes, were unprecedented “assertions of power, unmoored from the law” that violated constitutional free speech and the Civil Rights Act.

Like Columbia, he said Harvard had worked to fight anti-Semitism and other prejudice on its campus while preserving academic freedoms and the right to protest.

Hours after Professor Garber’s letter, the Trump administration’s Joint Task Force to Combat Anti-Semitism said it was freezing more than US$2 billion in contracts and grants to Harvard, America’s oldest and richest university. The administration did not respond to questions about which grants and contracts had been cut, and Harvard did not respond to a request for comment.

Some Columbia professors have sued the Trump administration, saying the grant terminations violated Title VI and their constitutional speech and due process rights. A federal judge in New York ordered the Trump administration to reply by May 1.

After reading the Harvard president’s letter, Columbia’s interim president Claire Shipman said in a statement on April 14 that

Columbia will continue with what it viewed as “good faith discussions” and “constructive dialogue”

with the US Justice Department’s anti-Semitism task force.

“We would reject any agreement in which the government dictates what we teach, research, or who we hire,” she wrote.

On April 14, a group of US universities, including

Princeton

and the University of Illinois, sued the Department of Energy over steep cuts to federal research funding in areas like advanced nuclear technology, cyber security and novel radioactive drugs.

Mr Trump, who took office on Jan 20, faces court challenges to his immigration policies and pushback from state attorneys-general trying to block his firing of government workers and suspension of trillions of dollars in federal grants, loans and financial support. REUTERS

See more on