UN nuclear chief says it’s possible Iran’s highly enriched uranium ‘is there’
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox
IAEA chief Rafael Grossi said that Iran had informed the IAEA that it would take “special measures” to protect its nuclear materials and equipment.
PHOTO: REUTERS
Follow topic:
VIENNA - There is a chance that much of Iran’s highly enriched uranium survived Israeli and US attacks because it may have been moved by Tehran soon after the first strikes, UN nuclear watchdog chief Rafael Grossi said on June 25.
Israel repeatedly struck Iranian nuclear facilities during its 12-day war with Tehran, and US forces bombed Iran’s underground nuclear facilities
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) chief Grossi said earlier this week that Iran had informed the IAEA on June 13 – the first day of Israeli strikes – that it would take “special measures” to protect its nuclear materials and equipment.
“They did not get into details as to what that meant but clearly that was the implicit meaning of that, so we can imagine that this material is there,” Mr Grossi told a press conference on Wednesday with members of the Austrian government.
“So for that, to confirm, for the whole situation, evaluation, we need to return (IAEA inspectors to Iran’s nuclear facilities).”
He said ensuring the resumption of IAEA inspections was his top priority as none had taken place since the bombing began although Iran’s Parliament approved moves on Wednesday to suspend such inspections.
The IAEA needs to determine how much remains of Iran’s stock of uranium enriched to up to 60 per cent purity – a level that is close to the roughly 90 per cent of weapons grade.
Uranium enrichment has both civilian and military applications. Iran has always denied seeking nuclear weapons and says its nuclear programme is solely for peaceful purposes.
The IAEA says no other country has enriched to such a high level without producing nuclear weapons, and Western powers say there is no civil justification for it.
‘Houglass approach’
The last quarterly IAEA report on May 31 indicated that Iran had, according to an IAEA yardstick, enough uranium enriched to up to 60 per cent purity for nine nuclear weapons if enriched further. It has enough for more bombs at lower enrichment levels such as 20 per cent and 5 per cent, the report showed.
A preliminary US intelligence assessment
“This hourglass approach is something I do not like... It’s in the eye of the beholder,” Mr Grossi said.
“When you look at the... reconstruction of the infrastructure, it’s not impossible. First, there has been some that survived the attacks, and then this is work that Iran knows how to do. It would take some time.”
Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi said on June 24 that Tehran’s view on the nuclear programme and the non-proliferation regime would now “witness changes, but it is not possible to say in what direction”.
Iran’s Parliament approved a Bill on June 25
Parliament Speaker Mohammad Baqer Qalibaf was quoted by state media as saying the IAEA “has put its international credibility up for sale” and that Iran would accelerate its civilian nuclear programme.
“This would be, of course, very regrettable,” Mr Grossi said of Iran’s threat to withdraw from the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT).
“I hope this is not the case. I don’t think this would help anybody, starting with Iran. This would lead to isolation and all sorts of problems and, why not, perhaps, if not the unravelling a very, very, very serious erosion in the NPT structure,” he said. REUTERS
