UN climate funding draft narrows options, but obstacles remain
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox
Landing a new accord to boost money for climate action in developing countries is the top priority of negotiators at the UN COP29 summit in Azerbaijan.
PHOTO: EPA-EFE
BAKU, Azerbaijan – A fresh draft of a UN climate deal released on Nov 13 proposes concrete options to raise funding for poorer countries, but leaves unresolved sticking points that have long delayed an agreement.
Landing a new accord to boost money for climate action in developing countries is the top priority of negotiators at the UN COP29 summit in Azerbaijan.
But it is deeply contentious
Most developing countries favour an annual commitment from wealthy countries of at least US$1.3 trillion (S$1.7 trillion), according to the latest draft of the long-sought climate finance pact.
This figure is more than 10 times the US$100 billion annually that a small pool of developed countries – among them the United States, European Union and Japan – currently pay.
Some donors are reluctant to promise large new amounts of public money from their budgets at a time when they face economic and political pressure at home.
An earlier version of the draft was rejected outright by developing countries, which considered the proposed terms weighted too heavily toward wealthy nations.
Three options
Fresh submissions were called, and the new document summarises three broad positions.
The first argues that rich, industrialised nations most responsible for climate change to date pay from their budgets.
The second option calls for other countries to share the burden, a key demand of developed countries, while the third puts forward a mix of the two.
A bloc of least-developed nations, mostly from Africa, are asking for US$220 billion, while small-island states at threat from rising seas want US$39 billion.
“The new text proposes more concrete options for reaching an agreement on the total amount, as well as specific objectives for the least developed or most vulnerable countries,” said Ms Friederike Roder, from Global Citizen, a non-government organisation.
“Unfortunately, this search for precision stops there. The proposals aimed at clearly defining what constitutes climate finance, and ensuring close and transparent monitoring remain insufficient,” she said.
The latest 34-page draft reflects all the options on the table, said Mr David Waskow, director at the World Resources Institute, a think tank.
“Negotiators now need to work to boil it down to some key decisions for the ministers to wrestle with next week,” he said.
COP29 runs until Nov 22, but climate talks often run into overtime. AFP


