Trump says US may provide air support to back Ukraine peace deal

WASHINGTON/KYIV - US President Donald Trump said on Aug 19 that he has

ruled out putting US troops on the ground in Ukraine,

but said the United States might provide air support as part of a deal to end Russia’s war in the country.

A day after Mr Trump pledged security guarantees to help end the war at an extraordinary White House summit, the path to peace remained uncertain as the US and its allies prepared to work out what military support for Ukraine might include.

“When it comes to security, (Europeans) are willing to put people on the ground. We’re willing to help them with things, especially, probably... by air,” Mr Trump said in an interview with the Fox News’ Fox & Friends programme.

Mr Trump did not elaborate. Later, in an interview with radio host Mark Levin, he characterised his negotiating style in trying to end the war as “probably instinct more than process”.

Hours after Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky’s meetings in Washington, Russia launched its biggest air assault in more than a month on Ukraine, with 270 drones and 10 missiles launched, the Ukrainian air force said.

The Energy Ministry said the strikes caused big fires at energy facilities in the central Poltava region, home to Ukraine’s only oil refinery.

Mr Trump conceded that Russian President Vladimir Putin might not want to make a deal after all, saying: “We’re going to find out about President Putin in the next couple of weeks.”

The nature of US military aid for Ukraine under a peace deal was unclear.

Air support could take many forms, such as missile defence systems or fighter jets enforcing a no-fly zone.

White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt confirmed that US air support was “an option and a possibility”, but, like Mr Trump, she did not provide any details.

“The President has definitively stated US boots will not be on the ground in Ukraine, but we can certainly help in the coordination and perhaps provide other means of security guarantees to our European allies,” she said at a news briefing.

Before the Aug 18 summit in Washington, Russia, which has often said that it agreed with the idea of security guarantees for Kyiv, reiterated its long-standing position that it “categorically” rejected “any scenarios involving the deployment of Nato troops in Ukraine”.

Analysts say more than one million people have been killed or wounded in the conflict, which began with Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022.

Trilateral meeting?

Mr Zelensky hailed the White House talks as a “major step forward” towards ending Europe’s deadliest conflict in 80 years and setting up a trilateral meeting with Mr Putin and Mr Trump.

The Ukrainian President’s warm rapport with Mr Trump contrasted sharply with their disastrous Oval Office meeting in February.

Mr Trump discussed Budapest as a venue for a summit involving Mr Zelensky and Mr Putin with Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban on Aug 19, a White House official said.

Istanbul, where delegations for the two countries have met previously, has also been mentioned, a senior administration official said.

Hungary is one of the few European places that Mr Putin can visit without fear of arrest on International Criminal Court charges, as Mr Orban maintains close ties with the Russian leader.

It was unclear whether Ukraine would accept Hungary as a venue. Neutral Switzerland also said it would be ready to host Mr Putin for any peace talks.

“They are in the process of setting it up,” Mr Trump told radio host Levin about a Putin-Zelensky meeting.

But Mr Trump cast doubt on whether he would attend. “Now I think it would be better if they met without me... If necessary, I’ll go,” he said.

Mr Trump, asked by Mr Levin how he balanced the interests of all the parties involved, said: “Well, it’s probably instinct more than process. I have instincts.”

There has been so far no confirmation from Russia that a potential bilateral meeting between Mr Putin and Mr Zelensky is being planned.

After Mr Trump’s call to Mr Putin on Aug 18, Kremlin aide Yuri Ushakov said only that the discussion included the idea of “raising the level of representatives” in peace talks from both countries – but he did not elaborate to what level.

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said in remarks published on Aug 19 that contacts involving national leaders must be prepared “with the utmost thoroughness” and cannot be pursed for the sake of “media coverage or evening broadcasts”.

Ukraine’s allies held talks in the so-called Coalition of the Willing format on Aug 19, discussing additional sanctions to crank up the pressure on Russia.

The grouping has also agreed that planning teams will meet US counterparts in the coming days to develop security guarantees for Ukraine.

Nato military leaders were expected to meet on Aug 20 to discuss Ukraine, with US General Dan Caine, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, expected to attend virtually, officials told Reuters.

Mr Putin has shown no sign of backing down from demands for territory, including land not under Russia’s military control, following his summit with Mr Trump on Aug 15 in Alaska.

Mr Neil Melvin, a director of International Security team at the Royal United Services Institute think-tank, said Russia could drag out the war while trying to deflect US pressure with a protracted peace negotiation.

Mr Melvin said both Ukraine and its European allies on one side and Russia on the other were striving “not to present themselves to Trump as the obstacle to his peace process”.

“They’re all tiptoeing around Trump” to avoid any blame, he said, adding that Mr Trump’s statements on security guarantees were “so vague, it’s very hard to take it seriously”. REUTERS