Rubio orders US diplomats to launch lobbying blitz against Europe’s tech law

WASHINGTON – President Donald Trump’s administration has instructed US diplomats in Europe to launch a lobbying campaign to build an opposition to the European Union’s Digital Services Act (DSA), which Washington says stifles free speech and imposes costs on US tech companies, an internal diplomatic cable seen by Reuters showed.

In a State Department cable dated Aug 4 that was signed by US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, the agency said the EU was pursuing “undue” restrictions on freedom of expression by its efforts to combat hateful speech, misinformation and disinformation and the DSA was further enhancing these curbs.

The EU’s DSA is a landmark law that is meant to make the online environment safer and fairer by compelling tech giants to do more to tackle illegal content, including hate speech and child sexual abuse material.

Mr Trump has made combating censorship – particularly what he sees as the stifling of conservative voices online – a major theme of his administration. Top US officials, including Vice-President J.D. Vance, have focused on European officials and regulations, accusing them of “censoring” Americans, an accusation that the European Union rejects.

The cable, whose headline described it as an “action request”, tasked American diplomats across US embassies in Europe with regularly engaging with EU governments and digital services authorities to convey US concerns about the DSA and the financial costs for US tech companies.

“Posts should focus efforts to build host government and other stakeholder support to repeal and/or amend the DSA or related EU or national laws restricting expression online,” the cable said in its “objective” section, referring to US diplomatic missions.

It provided specific suggestions to US diplomats on how the EU law may be changed and the talking points to help them make that argument.

State Department did not comment for this story. EU tech chief Henna Virkkunen’s office did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

In March, EU’s antitrust and tech chiefs told US lawmakers the new tech rule is aimed to keep digital markets open and is not targeted at US tech giants.

The Commission has also pushed back against speculation that the 27-member EU’s landmark tech regulatory regime could be included in the EU-US negotiations. “Our legislation will not be changed. The DMA (Designated Market Area) and the DSA are not on the table in the trade negotiations with the US,” Commission spokesman Thomas Regnier told a daily news conference.

A campaign for “free speech”

The order to US diplomats marks an acceleration of the administration’s efforts to promote what it calls “America’s free-speech tradition”, a policy that has added friction to the already fraught US relationship with European allies.

That policy came into focus in February, when

Mr Vance stunned European leaders by accusing them

– at a conference usually known for displays of transatlantic unity – of censoring the speech of groups such as Germany’s right-wing AfD party and backsliding on democracy.

During his trip, Mr Vance went on to meet the leaders of AfD — classified by Germany’s domestic intelligence service as a suspected extremist group – which became the country’s largest opposition party after the February election.

Mr Trump and his Republican allies have repeatedly accused the administration of Democratic former president Joe Biden of encouraging suppression of free speech on online platforms, claims that have centred on efforts to stem false claims about vaccines and elections.

The US Supreme Court ruled in 2024 that the Biden administration’s contacts with social media companies did not violate America’s First Amendment protections around free speech.

The directive by the State Department ordered US diplomats to investigate any claims of censorship which it described as “any government efforts to suppress protected forms of expression or coerce private companies to do the same”, adding that the priority should be given to any incidents that impact US citizens and companies.

Examples could include arrests, court cases, property seizures and online suspensions, it said.

“Posts should meet with government officials, businesses, civil society and impacted individuals to report on censorship cases, including but not limited to those related to the DSA,” the cable said.

In March, the chairman of the US Federal Communications Commission (FCC) specifically criticised DSA, saying it was not compatible with America’s free speech tradition.

In May, Mr Rubio

threatened visa bans for people who “censor” speech

by Americans, including on social media, and suggested the policy could target foreign officials regulating US tech companies.

“Overly broad controls”

US tech companies like Facebook and Instagram parent Meta have weighed in too, saying the DSA amounts to censorship of their platforms.

Tesla chief executive Elon Musk, who also owns social media company X, was a leading adviser to the US President before the two fell out, while the bosses of Amazon, Meta and Google-owner Alphabet took prominent spots at Mr Trump's inauguration in January.

Mr Rubio’s directive takes particular aim at DSA’s description of illegal content, saying it was expansive and told US diplomats to advocate to get the definition of “illegal content” narrowed so that it would not curb freedom of expression, including in political and religious discourse.

Another suggestion was to withdraw or amend the Code of Conduct on Disinformation, a framework under DSA, which the State Department said was setting “overly broad controls” on content in a way that was undermining freedom of expression.

Other talking points included removing or reducing fines for non-compliance to content restrictions and not relying on “trusted flaggers”, entities designated by national authorities to report illegal online content to platforms. REUTERS