Prince Harry returns to London court for final day of UK security appeal

Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox

Britain's Prince Harry walks to attend court, for his appeal against the rejection of his legal challenge to the British government's decision to take away his police protection when he is in Britain, outside the High Court in London, Britain, April 9, 2025. REUTERS/Isabel Infantes

Britain's Prince Harry is trying to overturn a decision that he would not automatically receive personal police security while in Britain.

PHOTO: REUTERS

Google Preferred Source badge

LONDON – Prince Harry returned to London’s Royal Courts of Justice on April 9 for his appeal over changes to his protection after he stepped down from royal duties, as the British government argued his security presented a “unique set of circumstances”.

Prince Harry, King Charles’ younger son, is trying to overturn a decision by the Home Office – the ministry responsible for policing – which decided in 2020 he would not automatically receive personal police security while in Britain.

Prince Harry stepped back from his royal duties in 2020 and now lives in California with his American wife Meghan and their two children.

Prince Harry’s challenge was rejected in 2024, with the High Court ruling the decision was lawful, but he was granted permission to appeal.

Prince Harry, 40, regularly conferred with his legal team on the final day of the two-day hearing, at times shaking his head, as the government’s lawyers argued that it was the right decision to adopt a “bespoke” approach to his security.

“The basis for the decision-making and the bespoke approach being adopted was that it had positive advantages from a security assessment point of view, not the least of which was that it would be focused on actual facts in the future,” Mr James Eadie, representing the Home Office, said.

Part of April 9’s hearing was heard in private as the court heard arguments concerning specific security arrangements.

A woman in the public gallery shouted support for Prince Harry as he left the court during a brief break.

Prince Harry’s lawyer, Ms Shaheed Fatima, had told the court on April 8 that the decision to take a flexible approach to security meant the prince had been “singled out for different, unjustified and inferior treatment”.

She also said in court filings that Al-Qaeda had recently called for Prince Harry to be murdered and that he and his wife Meghan had been involved in “a dangerous car pursuit with paparazzi in New York City” in 2023. REUTERS

See more on