Trump insists on red lines as Iran deal remains elusive

WASHINGTON - US President Donald Trump will make a peace deal with Iran only if it meets all of his conditions, a White House official told AFP on May 29, as questions swirled about the state of negotiations to end the war.

The White House had indicated he was close to a decision on a potential deal, even as Tehran insisted there was still “no final agreement” on ending the Middle East conflict.

A report from Iran’s Fars news agency also rebutted several key elements of Mr Trump’s characterisation of the deal, citing informed sources as calling his remarks a “mixture of truth and lies”.

US sources had told AFP the deal was just waiting on Mr Trump’s sign-off following weeks of halting negotiations to end a conflict that has engulfed the Middle East and shaken the global economy.

Mr Trump attended a two-hour meeting in the White House Situation Room on May 29, but did not reach a decision.

“President Trump will only make a deal that is good for America and satisfies his red lines,” a White House official told AFP afterward.

“Iran can never possess a nuclear weapon,” the official added.

Mr Trump announced the meeting in a lengthy social media post, reiterating long-held demands that Iran agree never to have nuclear weapons and must open the vital Strait of Hormuz shipping lane.

Iranian foreign ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baqaei, however, told state media that the Islamic republic “said goodbye to the language of ‘must’ 47 years ago”.

Exchanges of messages were continuing, he added, but “no final agreement has been reached yet”.

In a phone call with the Emir of Qatar, Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian said Iran was ready to achieve a “dignified framework” to end the war, according to state news agency IRNA.

In his post, Mr Trump said Tehran would remove mines in the Strait of Hormuz and end its blockade of the waterway with “no tolls,” while the US would lift its parallel blockade of Iranian ports.

The two countries would coordinate on removing and destroying Iran’s enriched uranium, he said, adding that “no money will be exchanged, until further notice”.

Fars, however, cited Iranian sources as saying that Tehran was demanding “the immediate release of US$12 billion (S$15 billion) in frozen Iranian assets” and that “until this payment is made, Iran will not move to the next phase of negotiations”.

On the toll-free reopening of Hormuz, the sources said, “no such clause appears in the text of the agreement,” while the comment on destroying Iran’s nuclear material “is fundamentally baseless”.

Mr Baqaei also told state TV that there were currently “no negotiations” taking place on Iran’s nuclear programme, as Iran’s top diplomat suggested the US was holding up a deal with its approach to the negotiations.

In a call with his Omani counterpart, Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said the US must drop “excessive demands and shifting and contradictory positions,” his ministry said.

Earlier, Iran’s Parliament speaker, Mr Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, who led his country’s delegation at talks with the US in Pakistan in April, said on X that Tehran placed “no trust in guarantees or words; only actions matter”.

Sources have previously told Iranian media that any agreement unilaterally announced by Mr Trump would not be recognised.

‘Telling the truth’?

Ali, a resident of the city of Tonekabon north of Tehran, said that whatever the deal was, there would likely be more strife to come.

“Both sides are speaking in a way that keeps their supporters satisfied. It’s not clear who is telling the truth,” the 49-year-old said.

“If a deal is reached, the internal power networks will likely start a fight against each other and against opponents more than before.”

Hopes of an agreement had risen on May 28 after US officials voiced optimism about the diplomatic progress.

Energy markets have whipsawed this week as investors parse the chances of an agreement that could potentially resume normal shipping through the crucial Strait of Hormuz.

Washington and Tehran have accused each other of violating the truce in and around the strait as recently as this week, with US strikes on the southern Iranian port of Bandar Abbas countered by retaliatory Iranian fire.

Iranian state TV said on May 29 that 24 ships had transited the strait in the past 24 hours, in coordination with the Revolutionary Guards and the foreign ministry.

But it warned that “ships from hostile countries face a severe response” from Iran’s military.

Lebanon fighting

On the war’s Lebanon front, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said on May 29 that his country’s forces had pushed deeper inside Lebanon, while Iran-backed Lebanese group Hezbollah claimed responsibility for a series of drone attacks on military targets in northern Israel, including troop gatherings and a barracks.

The attacks came as Israeli and Lebanese military delegations were holding security talks in Washington.

Mr Netanyahu said troops had crossed the Litani River, around 30km north of the Lebanon-Israel frontier, and were “hitting Hezbollah head on”.

Israel also kept up its heavy bombardment of south Lebanon, where the Lebanese health ministry said a rescuer was among the 11 killed.

A ceasefire between Israel and Hezbollah was supposed to have taken effect on April 17, but has never been observed.

Both sides accuse each other of violating it and justify their attacks by the other camp’s alleged breaches.

Lebanon was drawn into the war in early March when Hezbollah launched rockets at Israel over the killing of Iran’s supreme leader in US-Israeli attacks, prompting Israeli strikes and a ground invasion. AFP