News analysis
Syria’s rebels struck when Assad’s allies were weakened and distracted
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox
The timing of the rebels' assault and its success reveal the vulnerabilities of Syrian President Bashar Assad’s once formidable coalition.
PHOTO: EPA-EFE
For years, Syrian President Bashar al-Assad was able to beat back opposition fighters with the help of Russia, Iran and Hezbollah. Now, with those allies weakened or distracted by their own conflicts, rebels have seized the opportunity to shift the balance of power.
The rebel fighters spent months training and preparing for a surprise offensive,
On Nov 30, the rebels said they had captured almost all of Aleppo, one of Syria’s biggest cities, and they now control a broad stretch of land in the country’s west and north-west, according to the rebels and the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, a British-based war monitor.
The timing of the assault and its success, analysts say, reveal the vulnerabilities of Mr Assad’s once formidable coalition.
The Syrian civil war started 13 years ago when peaceful antigovernment protests were met with brutal crackdowns, escalating into a conflict between forces loyal to Mr Assad and rebels. Over time, the combatants drew support and foreign fighters from regional and international powers.
Iran, Hezbollah and Russia all sent help to the Syrian military. Hezbollah and Iranian-backed fighters battled alongside Syrian forces, Russia and Iran sent military advisers, and Russia carried out intense air strikes on rebel-held territory.
But today, Iran has been weakened by Israeli air strikes, battlefield losses by its proxy forces – the so-called axis of resistance – and an economic crisis at home. Hezbollah, one of those proxy forces, has been battered and diminished after 13 months of war with Israel and the killing of its leader Hassan Nasrallah. And Russia is now nearing the end of its third year of a war of attrition with Ukraine.
“He was able to survive the civil war because of all the assistance he got, and that’s gone,” Mr Joshua Landis, head of the Middle East studies program at the University of Oklahoma, said of Mr Assad. “Israel has changed the balance of power in the region by going on this all-out war on the axis of resistance.”
“Now Assad is all alone,” he said.
Mr Assad’s position was weakened even further by an apparent shift by Turkey, which is allied with many of the rebel groups and had opposed an offensive against the Syrian government.
Since the Hamas-led attack on Israel on Oct 7, 2023,
Russia has played perhaps the most crucial role in aiding Mr Assad. Although it is still assisting his government with some air strikes, it is entrenched in its own war in Ukraine and has pulled much of its military focus away from Syria.
Even with Hezbollah and Iran by its side since the early days of the civil war, the Syrian government still lost its grip on large swaths of territory until Russia directly intervened in 2015. Alongside Syrian warplanes and military helicopters, Russian air strikes helped turn the tide of the war in Assad’s favour.
Syria’s military historically struggled at urban warfare, but during the intense years of the civil war, its own air power and Russia’s allowed Assad to bomb the opposition into submission.
This time, though, “the regime was so much weaker then anyone thought and Russia was almost nowhere to be seen”, said Ms Dareen Khalifa, a senior adviser at the International Crisis Group.
Since Nov 27, Russia has carried out some air strikes against the rebels and on opposition-held towns and cities, but they were not overwhelming, according to Mr Haid. “We have not seen the same level of support and intensity of airstrikes that we saw previously,” he said.
In the wake of the assault on Aleppo, Moscow fired its top general in Syria, Mr Sergei Kisel, according to two military bloggers, Rybar and Military Informant, who have ties to the Russian Ministry of Defence.
Within four days, the rebels have drastically changed the front lines of the Syrian conflict, which had remained static for more than four years. And it was events beyond Syria’s borders that set the stage.
Last week, Hezbollah agreed to a ceasefire deal with Israel. The group leading the offensive against the Syrian government, Hayat Tahrir al-Sham, a former al-Qaida affiliate, may have decided that time was of the essence, Mr Haid and other analysts said.
But conditions on the ground in Syria also created the crucial conditions for a successful rebel offensive.
Even with his allies embroiled in other conflicts, Mr Assad seemed confident that his own front lines were not at risk. His government had withdrawn some of its forces there, while soldiers continued to staff checkpoints in government-held territory – often shaking Syrians down for bribes, according to multiple analysts.
Mr Assad has also failed to produce any economic improvement, which many Syrians had expected once the government recaptured large parts of the country in recent years. He also failed to unify the country or regain support from a population alienated by years of civil war and the unrelenting violence and terror carried out by the government.
The government also continued to forcibly conscript young men into the military – soldiers who, when faced with a rapidly advancing and organised rebel offensive last week, chose to flee rather than fight.
Leaders of the Hayat Tahrir al-Sham opposition group say they were watching the geopolitical shifts around them – especially the weakening of the axis of resistance by Israel, and Russia’s invasion of Ukraine
“At the same time,” she said, “they have been building up their military capability over the last year and have been signalling this military offensive over the last two months.” NYTIMES


