Jurors review testimony as they weigh verdict in Trump hush money trial
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox
A conviction will not prevent Donald Trump from campaigning for the presidency. Nor will it prevent him from taking office if he wins.
PHOTO: REUTERS
NEW YORK - Jurors asked the judge overseeing Donald Trump's hush money trial on May 30 to review testimony from prominent witnesses, to help them reach a verdict in the first criminal trial of a former US president.
Jurors also asked Justice Juan Merchan to repeat some of his guidance for considering the evidence presented at trial as they began their second day of deliberations in the historic case.
It was unclear when the 12 jurors would reach a verdict that could upend the Republican candidate’s hopes of recapturing the White House from Democratic President Joe Biden in the Nov 5 election.
Justice Merchan reread to the jurors roughly half the 55 pages of instructions he had read to them on May 29 before they began deliberations.
Jurors were then expected to hear court reporters recite testimony from two prominent witnesses, former Trump fixer Michael Cohen and former tabloid publisher David Pecker.
Justice Merchan said he would provide jurors with a laptop, headphones and a speaker to review the testimony as well.
“We’ll be here it looks like a long time,” Trump told reporters outside the courtroom.
A conviction will not prevent Trump from campaigning for the presidency. Nor will it prevent him from taking office if he wins.
New York prosecutors have charged Trump, 77, with falsifying business documents to try to cover up a hush money payment to porn star Stormy Daniels
Jurors appeared to be taking a close look at the testimony given by Mr Cohen, who paid the US$130,000 (S$175,800) that ensured Ms Daniels would not tell voters about her alleged 2006 sexual encounter with Trump.
Trump denies ever having sex with Ms Daniels.
Mr Cohen also testified that he and Trump discussed a plan to reimburse him through monthly payments disguised as legal fees – the alleged conduct that spurred the criminal charges.
Trump’s lawyers have said Mr Cohen’s testimony is unreliable, pointing to his criminal record and a history of lying. Justice Merchan also told jurors they must scrutinise his testimony carefully because he was an accomplice to the acts he described.
Prosecutors have said e-mails and other evidence corroborate Mr Cohen’s testimony.
Jurors were also due to rehear testimony from Mr Pecker, the former publisher of the National Enquirer tabloid, who had told the court he worked with Trump to suppress stories that might have hurt the businessman-turned-politician's campaign.
Prosecutors from Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s office face the burden of proving Trump’s guilt “beyond a reasonable doubt”, the standard under US law.
Jurors must reach any verdict unanimously. If they cannot resolve their differences, Justice Merchan can order a mistrial.
Opinion polls show Trump and Mr Biden locked in a tight race. But Reuters/Ipsos polling has found that a guilty verdict could cost Trump support.
Trump faces up to four years in prison if found guilty, but those found guilty of the crime he is charged with are more often fined or given probation.
Trump faces three other criminal prosecutions, but they are not expected to go to trial before the November election. He has pleaded not guilty in all of them. REUTERS
