WASHINGTON – ExxonMobil and Chevron Corp shareholders soundly rejected activists’ demands to take responsibility for curbing emissions by motorists and industries that burn their fuels.
Roughly 90 per cent of investors in North America’s two largest oil producers shot down a proposal by the environmental group, Follow This, that urged executives to set targets for reducing so-called Scope 3 emissions.
For Exxon and Chevron, support for the measure slipped by more than half from a year ago.
Exxon, Chevron and many of the other major international oil explorers and refiners already have laid out plans to cut climate-damaging pollution from internal activities such as drilling and fuel-making, also known as Scope 1 and 2 emissions.
Scope 3 controls have been a tougher sell among US fossil-fuel producers because executives maintain that those emissions are the responsibility of customers that burn their products.
One of the industry’s only options would be to curtail production of things like petrol and diesel.
The Greenhouse Gas Protocol – the main global standard for public and private entities to measure emissions – categorises Scope 1 as direct emissions from owned or controlled sources and Scope 2 as indirect emissions from the purchase and use of electricity, steam, heating and cooling.
Scope 3 emissions cover all other emissions that occur in a company’s upstream and downstream activities from transportation and distribution, to employee commuting and waste disposal.
Targeting Scope 3 emissions is a “deeply flawed” approach, Exxon chief executive officer Darren Woods told investors.
“If an energy company discontinues operations to meet Scope 3 targets while the demand for energy remains, consumers can be forced to make do with less energy, pay significantly higher prices or return to higher-emitting sources,” he said.
Chevron CEO Mike Wirth, meanwhile, urged shareholders to vote down the proposal, noting that “the majority of Chevron’s Scope 3 emissions result from the use of products by customers, not activities controlled by Chevron.”
Follow This founder Mark van Baal said it’s “incomprehensible that most investors still accept these supermajors’ refusal to cut emissions this decade”. BLOOMBERG
