British government accuses police of pro-Palestinian bias over marches

Demonstrators protesting in solidarity with Palestinians in Gaza, at Trafalgar Square in London, on Nov 4. PHOTO: REUTERS

LONDON – Britain’s government escalated its row with London’s police chief on Thursday over the handling of a pro-Palestinian march this weekend, accusing his officers of taking a softer stance towards left-wing causes.

Plans for a demonstration in London on Saturday’s Armistice Day has sparked a row between the government and the police.

Prime Minister Rishi Sunak said he would hold the force accountable for any trouble after it said there was not enough reason to ban it.

London has been the venue for some of the biggest demonstrations in Europe since Hamas attacked Israel on Oct 7.

Tens of thousands of marchers have gathered each weekend to demand an end to Israel’s retaliatory bombing of Gaza.

The police said they expect a significant demonstration on Saturday, Nov 11, the anniversary of the end of World War I.

They added that there are no plans for protests on Nov 12, when formal Remembrance Sunday events are held in central London.

Mr Sunak has called the march disrespectful.

Police Commissioner Mark Rowley said however that any ban would require intelligence of a threat of serious disorder.

He added that such bans had not been implemented for a decade.

Interior Minister Suella Braverman has called the demonstrations “hate marches”. 

Writing in The Times on Thursday, she said they were an “assertion of primacy by certain groups – particularly Islamists” and a show of strength. 

“Unfortunately, there is a perception that senior police officers play favourites when it comes to protesters,” she wrote. 

“During Covid-19, why was it that lockdown objectors were given no quarter by public order police yet Black Lives Matter demonstrators were enabled, allowed to break rules and even greeted with officers taking the knee?”

Demonstrators taking part in a protest inside Charing Cross station following the ‘London Rally For Palestine’, on Nov 4. PHOTO: AFP

Ms Braverman, seen as a possible future leader of the governing Conservative Party, said that while freedom of speech and assembly were long-held traditions in Britain, there was “a debate to be had” over whether some public displays were so offensive they should be banned. 

Mr Neil Basu, a former senior officer in London’s Met Police, said the political criticism could increase the likelihood of counter-protesters turning up, increasing the risk of violence.

“It’s somewhat ironic that all of this rhetoric about this march might actually be increasing the intelligence case, to have it banned,” he told LBC Radio.   

Nearly 200 people have been arrested since the Oct 7 attack for hate crimes in Britain, including anti-Semitic and Islamophobic offences, as well as public order offences, many of which were racially aggravated and linked to protests. REUTERS

Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.