Russia fails to win back UN aviation council seat in rebuke over signal disturbances

Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox

FILE PHOTO: Members of the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) agency arrive at ICAO headquarters in Montreal, Quebec, Canada October 1, 2022.  REUTERS/Christinne Muschi/File Photo

Russia faces condemnation from the International Civil Aviation Organisation's governing council for disturbing signals used in navigation.

FILE PHOTO: REUTERS

Follow topic:

MONTREAL – Russia failed to win enough support on Saturday to get elected to the United Nations aviation agency’s governing council, in the latest rebuke of Moscow for actions taken after its 2022 invasion of Ukraine.

Russia received 87 votes, short of the 93 votes it needed to win back a seat on the International Civil Aviation Organisation’s (ICAO’s) 36-nation governing council during the agency’s assembly, which runs through Oct 3 in Montreal.

Russia in 2022 lost its spot on the first part of the council, which includes countries like China, Brazil, the United States and Australia as “states of chief importance in air transport,” following

its invasion of Ukraine.

A Russian representative immediately called for “a repeat round of voting,” which was not accepted by the assembly.

A spokesperson for Russia’s transport ministry was not immediately available for comment.

The ICAO sets global safety standards for civil aviation with the governing council playing a critical role in that process.

In addition to the war in Ukraine, Russia faces council condemnation for

disturbing signals used in navigation,

the Global Navigation Satellite System and Global Positioning System - charges that Moscow denies.

“They are the most aggressive abuser and violator of international agreements and international norms,” US Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy told Reuters by phone earlier this week about Russia.

“How could we let someone come into a world organization that is truly making the airspace more dangerous, not more safe?” REUTERS

See more on