Putin wins Ukraine concessions in Alaska, but did not get all he wanted

Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox

US President Donald Trump (right) and Russian leader Vladimir Putin at a media briefing after their Aug 15 summit in Alaska

US President Donald Trump (right) and Russian leader Vladimir Putin at a media briefing after their Aug 15 summit in Alaska.

PHOTO: NYTIMES

Follow topic:
  • Putin's Alaska summit with Trump yielded key wins, including shifting US focus from a Ukraine ceasefire to a peace settlement, aligning with Russia's aims.
  • Despite pomp and restored US-Russia dialogue, Trump didn't grant Putin the desired economic reset or immediate sanctions relief on China.
  • Trump pressured Zelensky to negotiate, hinting at land swaps, while Russia advances in Donetsk; ultimate concessions from both sides remain uncertain.

AI generated

MOSCOW In a few short hours in Alaska, Mr Vladimir Putin managed to convince Mr Donald Trump that a Ukraine ceasefire was not the way to go, stave off US sanctions and spectacularly shatter years of Western attempts to isolate the Russian President.

Outside Russia, Mr Putin was widely hailed as the victor of

the Alaska summit

while at home, the Russian state media cast the US President as a prudent statesman, even as critics in the West accused him of being out of his depth.

The Russian state media made much of the fact that Mr Putin was afforded a military fly-over, that Mr Trump waited for him on the red carpet, and then let the Russian President ride with him in the back of the “Big Beast”, the US presidential limousine.

“Western media are in a state that could be described as derangement verging on complete insanity,” said Ms Maria Zakharova, Russia’s Foreign Ministry spokeswoman.

“For three years, they talked about Russia’s isolation, and today they saw the red carpet rolled out to welcome the Russian President to the United States.”

But Mr Putin’s biggest summit wins related to the war in Ukraine, where he appears to have persuaded Mr Trump, at least in part, to embrace Russia’s vision of how a deal should be done.

Mr Trump had gone into the meeting saying he wanted a quick ceasefire and had threatened Mr Putin and Russia’s biggest buyer of its crude oil – China – with sanctions.

Afterwards, Mr Trump said he had agreed with Mr Putin that negotiators should go straight to a peace settlement and not via a ceasefire as Ukraine and its European allies had been demanding – previously with US support.

“The US President’s position has changed after talks with Putin, and now the discussion will focus not on a truce, but on the end of the war. And a new world order. Just as Moscow wanted,” Ms Olga Skabeyeva, one of Russian state TV’s most prominent talk-show hosts, said on Telegram.

Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, saying Kyiv’s embrace of the West had become a threat to its security, something Ukraine has dismissed as a false pretext for what it calls a colonial-style land grab.

The war – the deadliest in Europe for 80 years – has killed or wounded well over a million people from both sides, including thousands of mostly Ukrainian civilians, according to analysts.

No economic reset

The fact that the summit even took place was a win for Mr Putin before it started, given how it brought him in from the diplomatic cold with such pomp.

Mr Putin is wanted by the International Criminal Court,

accused of the war crime of deporting hundreds of children from Ukraine. Russia denies any wrongdoing, saying it acted to remove unaccompanied children from a conflict zone. Neither Russia nor the US are members of the court.

Mr Dmitry Medvedev, Russia’s former president and a close Putin ally, said the summit had achieved a major breakthrough when it came to restoring US-Russia relations, which Mr Putin had lamented were at their lowest level since the Cold War.

“The mechanism for high-level meetings between Russia and the United States has been restored in its entirety,” he said.

But Mr Putin did not get everything he wanted and it is unclear how durable his gains will be.

For one thing, Mr Trump did not hand him the economic reset he wanted – something that would boost the Russian President at a time when his economy is showing signs of strain after more than three years of war and increasingly tough Western sanctions.

Mr Yuri Ushakov, Mr Putin’s foreign policy aide, said before the summit that the talks would touch on trade and economic issues.

Mr Putin had brought his finance minister and the head of Russia’s sovereign wealth fund all the way to Alaska with a view to discussing potential deals on the Arctic, energy, space and the technology sector.

In the end, though, they did not get a look in. Mr Trump told reporters on Air Force One before the summit started that there would be no business done until the war in Ukraine was settled.

It is also unclear how long the sanctions reprieve Mr Putin won will last.

Mr Trump said it would probably be two or three weeks before he would need to return to the question of thinking about imposing secondary sanctions on China, to hurt financing for Moscow’s war machine.

Nor did Mr Trump – judging by information so far made public – do what some Ukrainian and European politicians had feared the most and sell Kyiv out by doing a deal over the head of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.

Mr Trump made clear that it was up to Mr Zelensky whether he would agree – or not – with ideas of land swops and other elements for a peace settlement the US President had discussed with Mr Putin in Alaska.

Although as Mr Trump’s bruising Oval Office encounter with Mr Zelensky showed earlier in 2025, if Mr Trump thinks the Ukrainian leader is not engaging constructively, he can quickly turn on him.

Indeed, Mr Trump was quick to start piling pressure on Mr Zelensky, who is expected in Washington on Aug 18, saying after the summit that Ukraine had to agree to a deal because “Russia is a very big power, and they’re not”.

“The main point is that both sides have directly placed responsibility on Kyiv and Europe for achieving future results in the negotiations,” said Mr Medvedev, who added that the summit showed it was possible to negotiate and fight at the same time.

Donbas demand

While deliberations continue, Russian forces are slowly but steadily advancing on the battlefield and threatening a series of Ukrainian towns and cities whose fall could speed up Moscow’s quest to take complete control of the eastern region of Donetsk, one of four Ukrainian regions Russia claims as its own.

Donetsk, some 25 per cent of which remains beyond Russia’s control, and the Luhansk region together make up the industrial Donbas region, which Mr Putin has made clear he wants in its entirety.

Mr Putin told Mr Trump he would be ready to freeze the front lines in Zaporizhzhia and Kherson, two other regions he claims, if Kyiv agreed to withdraw from Donetsk and Luhansk, a person familiar with the matter told Reuters.

Mr Zelensky rejected the demand, the source said.

According to The New York Times, Mr Trump told European leaders that Ukrainian recognition of Donbas as Russian would help get a deal done. The US is ready to be part of security guarantees for Ukraine, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said.

Some Kremlin critics said it would be a mistake to credit Mr Putin with too much success at this stage.

“Russia has re-established its status and got dialogue with the US,” said Mr Michel Duclos, a French diplomat who formerly served in Moscow and is an analyst at the Institut Montaigne think-tank. “But when you have a war on your hands and your economy is collapsing, these are limited gains.”

Russian officials deny the economy, which has been put on a war footing and has proved more resilient than the West forecast despite heavy sanctions, is collapsing. But they have acknowledged signs of overheating and have said the economy could enter recession in 2026 unless policies are adjusted.

“For Putin, economic problems are secondary to his goals, but he understands our vulnerability and the costs involved,” said one source familiar with Kremlin thinking.

“Both sides will have to make concessions. The question is to what extent. The alternative, if we want to defeat them militarily, is to mobilise resources more deeply and use them more skilfully, but we are not going down that road for various reasons.

“It will be Trump’s job to pressure Ukraine to recognise the agreements.” REUTERS

See more on