Nato criticises Putin for ‘dangerous and irresponsible’ nuclear rhetoric

Russian President Vladimir Putin said he planned to station tactical nuclear weapons in Belarus. PHOTO: AFP

KYIV - Nato on Sunday criticised Mr Vladimir Putin for what it called his “dangerous and irresponsible” nuclear rhetoric, a day after the Russian President said he planned to station tactical nuclear weapons in Belarus.

Mr Putin likened the move on Saturday to the United States stationing its weapons in Europe, while insisting that Russia would not violate its nuclear non-proliferation promises.

Although not unexpected, the plan is one of Russia’s clearest nuclear signals since the beginning of its invasion of Ukraine 13 months ago, and Ukraine called for a meeting of the United Nations Security Council in response.

While Washington, the world’s other nuclear superpower, played down concerns about Mr Putin’s announcement, Nato said the Russian President’s non-proliferation pledge and his description of US weapons deployment overseas were way off the mark.

“Russia’s reference to Nato’s nuclear sharing is totally misleading. Nato allies act with full respect of their international commitments,” Nato spokesman Oana Lungescu said in e-mailed comments to Reuters on Sunday.

“Russia has consistently broken its arms control commitments,” she said.

A top security adviser to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, Mr Oleksiy Danilov, said Russia’s plan would also destabilise Belarus, which he said had been “taken hostage” by Moscow.

Experts said Russia’s move was significant since it had – until now – been proud that unlike the US, it had not deployed nuclear weapons outside its borders. It may be the first time since the mid-1990s that it has done so.

Mr Mykhailo Podolyak, another senior Zelensky adviser, on Sunday scoffed on Twitter at Mr Putin’s plan.

“He admits that he is afraid of losing and all he can do is scare with tactics,” he wrote.

Russia on Monday said these criticisms would not change its plans to deploy tactical nuclear weapons to Belarus.

“Such a reaction, of course, cannot influence Russian plans,” Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said.

Washington appeared to see no change in the potential for Moscow to use nuclear weapons in the war in Ukraine, and it and Nato said the news would not affect their own nuclear position.

Tactical nuclear weapons refer to those used for specific gains on a battlefield rather than those with the capacity to wipe out cities. It is unclear how many such weapons Russia has, given that it is an area still shrouded in Cold War secrecy.

Ukraine calls for UN meeting

Ukraine’s foreign ministry called for an extraordinary meeting of the UN Security Council after Mr Putin’s announcement, and it asked the international community to take decisive measures to prevent Russia’s use of nuclear weapons.

“Russia once again confirms its chronic inability to be a responsible steward of nuclear weapons as a means of deterrence and prevention of war, not as a tool of threats and intimidation,” it said.

The European Union joined the chorus of condemnation on Sunday, with its foreign policy chief Josep Borrell urging Belarus not to host the weapons and threatening further sanctions.

Analysts at the Washington-based Institute for the Study of War said the risk of escalation to nuclear war remains extremely low.

In Washington, Mr Michael McCaul, the Republican chairman of the US House of Representatives’ foreign affairs committee, said he regarded Russia’s plan as disturbing and designed to intimidate the West.

“I think this is sabre-rattling on the part of Putin basically to try to frighten,” he told the Fox News Sunday programme. “These tactical nukes are disturbing.”

Putin decries a Western ‘axis’

Remote video URL

Mr Putin said Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko had long requested the deployment. There was no immediate reaction from Mr Lukashenko.

While the Belarusian army has not formally fought in Ukraine, Minsk and Moscow have close military ties. Minsk allowed Moscow to use Belarusian territory to send troops into Ukraine in 2022.

Mr Putin on Sunday also denied Moscow was creating a military alliance with Beijing, and instead asserted that Western powers are building a new “axis” similar to the partnership between Germany and Japan during World War II.

He has often portrayed the Ukraine war as Moscow fighting a Ukraine in the grip of supposed Nazis, abetted by Western powers menacing Russia.

Ukraine – which was part of the Soviet Union and itself suffered devastation at the hands of Adolf Hitler’s forces – rejects those parallels as spurious pretexts for a war of conquest.

On the battlefield, Russian forces hit military targets in Kharkiv, Donetsk, Zaporizhzhia and Kherson regions, causing significant Ukrainian casualties, Russia’s defence ministry said on Sunday.

Russia’s Tass news agency cited a law enforcement source and the emergency services as saying on Sunday that a Ukraine-operated drone had caused an explosion in the centre of the Russian town of Kireyevsk in the Tula region, hurting three people and damaging three residential buildings.

Russia has said in the past that Ukrainian drones have flown into its territory and caused damage to civilian infrastructure, an assertion Kyiv denies.

Ukrainian presidential chief of staff Andriy Yermak said Russian forces have destroyed two apartment buildings in a missile strike on the eastern city of Avdiivka in the Donetsk region. He said there were no casualties.

Ukraine’s General Staff said on Sunday that Ukrainian forces repelled 85 Russian attacks over the past 24 hours across the eastern front, including the Bakhmut area, the scene of brutal fighting in the past few months.

Reuters could not immediately verify the battlefield reports.


Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.