Manchester bombing survivors win harassment case against conspiracy theorist
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox
Mr Martin Hibbert, who was paralysed in the Manchester Arena bombing in 2017, speaks to media outside the Royal Courts of Justice in London on July 25.
PHOTO: REUTERS
Follow topic:
LONDON - Two survivors of a bombing that killed 22 people following an Ariana Grande concert
Mr Martin Hibbert was paralysed from the waist down and his daughter Eve, then 14, suffered a catastrophic brain injury in the bombing at Manchester Arena in northern England in 2017.
They sued self-styled journalist Richard Hall, who claimed without evidence that the attack was orchestrated by British government agencies, for alleged harassment.
Their case bears some similarities to defamation lawsuits brought against US conspiracy theorist Alex Jones by relatives of victims of the 2012 Sandy Hook school shooting.
Judge Karen Steyn said in a written ruling that Mr Hall’s conduct in publishing a book and videos about the Manchester Arena bombing and filming Ms Eve Hibbert and her mother outside their house in 2019 amounted to harassment.
Mr Hibbert said in a statement that he wanted the ruling to “open the door for change and to help protect others from what we have been put through”.
The Hibberts’ lawyer Kerry Gillespie said the judgment sent “a very clear message to people who think they have the right to publish absurd, harmful, unfounded allegations against others”.
Mr Hall was not immediately available for comment.
He fought the lawsuit, arguing that journalistic investigation did not amount to harassment and an injunction would be a disproportionate interference with his free speech rights.
Judge Steyn, however, said Mr Hall’s course of conduct was “a negligent, indeed reckless, abuse of media freedom”.
“Freedom of expression undoubtedly provides protection for journalism which focuses on important occurrences, such as the attack, and investigates the veracity and accuracy of established narratives as to what took place,” she said.
“But Mr Hall has abused media freedom. Over a period of years, he has repeatedly published false allegations, based on the flimsiest of analytical techniques, and dismissing the obvious, tragic reality to which so many ordinary people have attested.”
A hearing to decide whether the Hibberts should be granted an injunction and paid any damages will take place on Nov 8. REUTERS
