News analysis

King Charles’ visit to US shows UK playing long game in fixing strained ties

Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox

FILE PHOTO: Britain's King Charles and U.S. President Donald Trump interact during a state dinner for the King and Queen Camilla at the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S., April 28, 2026. REUTERS/Suzanne Plunkett/File Photo

Britain's King Charles and US President Donald Trump attend a state dinner for the King and Queen Camilla at the White House on April 28.

PHOTO: REUTERS

Google Preferred Source badge

- King Charles’ courting of President Donald Trump on his state visit will not repair the recent fraying of US-British relations, but underscores how London is playing a longer game in trying to preserve the historic alliance.

Britain has routinely deployed the royal family to charm the mercurial US president, hosting him for a lavish state visit in September 2025 and dispatching King Charles and Queen Camilla to Washington this week for the 250th anniversary of the US Declaration of Independence from British rule.

Mr Trump has repeatedly mocked and criticised British Prime Minister Keir Starmer in recent weeks over his refusal to back the Iran war, but diplomats and commentators said King Charles’ task was not so much to smooth political ties as to remind the American public and their politicians of the depth and longevity of the relationship.

Mr Nigel Sheinwald, Britain’s ambassador to the US between 2007 and 2012, said the King had used a rare and well-received address to Congress to highlight the web of bilateral ties across culture, security, defence and technology.

“(He will) hope that some of it will have an enduring impact on his audiences, which are much wider than the administration and will go on much longer than the administration,” Mr Sheinwald told Reuters.

Worst relations since Suez

The 77-year-old monarch’s four-day visit comes against the backdrop of the worst relations between the two countries since the Suez Crisis in 1956, and amid broader strains between the Trump administration and its European allies.

Mr Trump earlier this year threatened to seize Greenland – which is part of the kingdom of Denmark – and more recently has harshly criticised NATO allies for not sending their navies to help open the Strait of Hormuz, which Iran has effectively shut.

In his address to Congress on April 28, the highlight of his visit which ends on April 30, King Charles praised the US-UK alliance while delivering several subtle rebukes to Mr Trump, warning against the perils of becoming ever more inward-looking and promoting the need for peace and compassion in public life.

“The King is a masterful diplomat,” said one senior government official.

In Australia, where King Charles is also head of state, a column in the Sydney Morning Herald praised the “persuasive and incredibly sly” address for telling Mr Trump what his many critics think he needed to hear.

But Mr Mark Lyall Grant, Britain’s former national security adviser and a career diplomat, said that while the events involving Mr Trump were important, the broader mission of the King and Queen was to address the American people on a trip that also includes stops in New York and Virginia.

“Just as there have been difficult relations at the political level in the past, the King symbolises the British state, and this visit therefore reminds the people of America, in particular, of what that relationship is and what it means to both countries,” he said.

Britain has long vaunted its close ties with the US but the increasingly visible strains during Mr Trump’s second presidency – almost a decade after the UK voted to leave the European Union – have sparked a bout of introspection about how it should navigate a much more volatile world.

Not special anymore

Mr Christian Turner, Britain’s current ambassador to the US, said at a recent private event he did not like the term “special relationship” that was coined by wartime leader Winston Churchill because it harked back to the past.

The Foreign Office said the comments, reported by the Financial Times, were not government policy.

Critics of the government have also argued that while Mr Trump’s tone may sometimes be offensive, he is not wrong to say that Britain, like other European nations, must spend more on defence if it wants to be taken seriously by global partners.

Diplomats and commentators said the deployment of royal “soft power” would not provide cover for Mr Starmer’s centre-left Labour government for long, but that it would help keep channels open while the prime minister works to get back onto a better footing with the right-wing US president.

“It’s a perfect opportunity to keep the diplomatic channels open and to keep those conversations flowing,” royal commentator Afua Hagan said.

Mr Starmer will be hoping that Charles’ visit will have worked the same magic for bilateral ties as the late Queen Elizabeth did in the immediate aftermath of the Suez crisis.

“When my mother visited in 1957, not the least of her tasks was to help put the “special” back into our relationship after a crisis in the Middle East,” King Charles said at the state dinner at the White House on April 28.

“Nearly 70 years on, it is hard to imagine anything like that happening today,” he joked. REUTERS

See more on