New testimony raises pressure on British PM Starmer over choice of envoy to US

LONDON – A former top British Foreign Ministry official said on April 21 that he had faced “constant pressure” from Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s office to speed up the appointment of his pick as the ambassador to the US, deepening a row that threatens the British leader.

A war of words over who should ultimately take the blame for appointing Labour veteran Peter Mandelson to Britain’s highest diplomatic post despite his history and known ties to late US sex offender Jeffrey Epstein has piled pressure on Mr Starmer, prompting calls by critics for his resignation.

Mr Starmer has said he was “wrong” to appoint Mr Mandelson to the role and has expressed regret, but on April 20 put the blame firmly on Foreign Ministry officials for failing to tell him that a security vetting body had advised against his appointment.

On April 21, it was the turn of Mr Olly Robbins, the ministry’s former top official who was sacked late on April 16 after Mr Starmer and Foreign Secretary Yvette Cooper said they had lost confidence in him, to mount his defence.

Former top official says he was under ‘constant pressure’

While much of what he said backed up Mr Starmer’s account of being told Mr Mandelson had been granted clearance for the role, Mr Robbins spoke of “constant pressure” to speed things up and that the appointment had been treated as virtually a done deal.

“I walked into a situation in which there was already a very, very strong expectation... that he needed to be in post and in America as quickly as humanly possible,” a sometimes visibly upset Mr Robbins told a parliamentary committee.

“I think throughout January (2025), honestly, my office, the foreign secretary’s office, were under constant pressure,” Mr Robbins said, describing himself at one point as a “scapegoat”.

“There was an atmosphere of constant chasing,” he said, describing “very frequent phone calls” from Mr Starmer’s private office.

Mr Starmer’s spokesperson rejected Mr Robbins’ allegations, telling reporters: “I would draw a distinction between the idea of pressure, and being kept informed about the process and the progress of the appointment.”

Mr Robbins’ account is likely to increase the pressure on Mr Starmer, who after winning the largest majority in modern history for Labour at a national election in 2024 is facing new calls to step down over a scandal which has run for months.

Labour lawmakers have said there would not be an immediate move to oust Mr Starmer, especially as the party is expected to suffer big losses in local elections in England and regional votes in Wales and Scotland on May 7.

Mr Starmer’s critics have repeatedly raised concerns over what they say is a lack of political nous and a bunker mentality.

Some lawmakers from his Labour Party highlighted Mr Robbins’ revelation that Downing Street had also pushed for an ambassadorial job for Mr Starmer’s former senior communications director Matthew Doyle.

Lord Doyle was removed from the Labour Party over his links to a convicted sex offender and he has apologised for his actions, but one lawmaker described the attempt to get him a job by Downing Street as “pretty damning”.

War of words widens between officials and Downing Street

Mr Robbins said that when he took office on Jan 20, 2025, Mr Mandelson’s appointment had already been announced, approval had been given by King Charles, it had been agreed to by the US government and Mr Mandelson was being granted access to highly classified briefings on a case-by-case basis. He said it would have damaged relations with the US if the Foreign Office had blocked the appointment at that stage, and that he had given the green light by saying Mr Mandelson had cleared vetting, based on what they knew at the time.

Mr Robbins questioned whether Downing Street even wanted the Foreign Ministry to complete so-called developed vetting clearance – a status that allows individuals access to information regarded as top secret.

It was down to the Foreign Ministry to complete that process, he said, and officials had stuck to a system whereby reports from a unit called UK Security Vetting were never shared with ministers to protect the candidate’s confidentiality.

But he did say the unit had advised the appointment was a borderline case and they were leaning against granting clearance – a message Mr Starmer says his government never received.

Even some senior ministers have subtly moved to distance themselves from him over the Mandelson decision. Asked what went through his mind over the decision to appoint him, British Energy Minister Ed Miliband told Sky News: “That it could blow up, that it could go wrong.” REUTERS